A macro to build rpms/ruby without systemtap dependency

[Jun Aruga]

Hello,

I am working for ruby module.
https://src.fedoraproject.org/modules/ruby

I want a macro definition to build the ruby without systemtap rpm (+ dtrace
command), such as below macro.

%global with_rubypick 1

Because it is uncertainly when systemtap module will be prepared or not
right now.

Is it possible to update ruby.spec for that?

Jun

[Vít Ondruch]

I think it makes sense. Please either open ticket in BZ or send a PR in
Pagure.

Thx

Vít

Dne 15.10.2017 v 11:00 Jun Aruga napsal(a):
> Hello,
>
> I am working for ruby module.
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/modules/ruby
>
> I want a macro definition to build the ruby without systemtap rpm (+
> dtrace command), such as below macro.
>
> %global with_rubypick 1
>
> Because it is uncertainly when systemtap module will be prepared or
> not right now.
>
> Is it possible to update ruby.spec for that?
>
> Jun
>
> ruby-sig mailing list -- [e-mail]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [e-mail]

[Pavel Valena]

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Vít Ondruch" 
> To: [e-mail]
> Sent: Monday, October 16, 2017 9:56:44 AM
> Subject: Re: A macro to build rpms/ruby without systemtap dependency
>
> I think it makes sense. Please either open ticket in BZ or send a PR in
> Pagure.
>
> Thx
>
> Vít
>
> Dne 15.10.2017 v 11:00 Jun Aruga napsal(a):
>
> Hello,
>
> I am working for ruby module.
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/modules/ruby
>
> I want a macro definition to build the ruby without systemtap rpm (+ dtrace
> command), such as below macro.
>
> %global with_rubypick 1

Is it not a module capability to change/define spec file macros?
Then it would be possible to change the above to[AFAIR]:

%{?!global with_rubypick:%global with_rubypick 1}

And then override it on module to 0.

Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong.

Pavel
> Because it is uncertainly when systemtap module will be prepared or not right
> now.
>
> Is it possible to update ruby.spec for that?
>
> Jun

[Jun Aruga]

Hi,
> I think it makes sense. Please either open ticket in BZ or send a PR in

Pagure.

OK I will open ticket in BZ and send the PR in Pagure.

I am not sure that "module capability"'s meaning.
But the macro variable is defined as a module scope.
Ref. https://src.fedoraproject.org/modules/perl/blob/master/f/perl.yaml#_161
> %{?!global with_rubypick:%global with_rubypick 1}

I am not sure if your mentioned code is correct.
I am going to refer below code that we know as a bootstrap logic, and also
refer above Perl's logic.

%{?_with_bootstrap: %global bootstrap 1}

Jun

On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 12:39 PM, Pavel Valena  wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Vít Ondruch" 
> > To: [e-mail]
> > Sent: Monday, October 16, 2017 9:56:44 AM
> > Subject: Re: A macro to build rpms/ruby without systemtap dependency
> >
> > I think it makes sense. Please either open ticket in BZ or send a PR in
> > Pagure.
> >
> > Thx
> >
> > Vít
> >
> > Dne 15.10.2017 v 11:00 Jun Aruga napsal(a):
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I am working for ruby module.
> > https://src.fedoraproject.org/modules/ruby
> >
> > I want a macro definition to build the ruby without systemtap rpm (+
>
> dtrace
> > command), such as below macro.
> >
> > %global with_rubypick 1
>
> Is it not a module capability to change/define spec file macros?
> Then it would be possible to change the above to[AFAIR]:
>
> %{?!global with_rubypick:%global with_rubypick 1}
>
> And then override it on module to 0.
>
> Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong.
>
> Pavel
> > Because it is uncertainly when systemtap module will be prepared or not
>
> right
> > now.
> >
> > Is it possible to update ruby.spec for that?
> >
> > Jun

[Vít Ondruch]

Dne 17.10.2017 v 07:33 Jun Aruga napsal(a):
> Hi,
> > I think it makes sense. Please either open ticket in BZ or send a PR
>
> in Pagure.
>
> OK I will open ticket in BZ and send the PR in Pagure.

One or the other is enough, you won't get more attention opening PR as
well as BZ ticket.
> I am not sure that "module capability"'s meaning.
> But the macro variable is defined as a module scope.
> Ref.
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/modules/perl/blob/master/f/perl.yaml#_161
> > %{?!global with_rubypick:%global with_rubypick 1}
>
> I am not sure if your mentioned code is correct.

Of course the first "global" should not be there, but you get the
picture ...

Anyway, the details are probably better to discuss in the PR (as soon as
it is sent), otherwise this is just academic ...

V.
> I am going to refer below code that we know as a bootstrap logic, and
> also refer above Perl's logic.
>
> %{?_with_bootstrap: %global bootstrap 1}
>
> Jun
>
> On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 12:39 PM, Pavel Valena <[e-mail]
> > wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Vít Ondruch" <[e-mail]
> <mailto:[e-mail]>>
> > To: [e-mail]
> <mailto:[e-mail]>
> > Sent: Monday, October 16, 2017 9:56:44 AM
> > Subject: Re: A macro to build rpms/ruby without systemtap dependency
> >
> >
> >
> > I think it makes sense. Please either open ticket in BZ or send
> a PR in
> > Pagure.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Thx
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Vít
> >
> >
> >
> > Dne 15.10.2017 v 11:00 Jun Aruga napsal(a):
> >
> >
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I am working for ruby module.
> > https://src.fedoraproject.org/modules/ruby
> <https://src.fedoraproject.org/modules/ruby>
> >
> > I want a macro definition to build the ruby without systemtap
> rpm (+ dtrace
> > command), such as below macro.
> >
> > %global with_rubypick 1
>
> Is it not a module capability to change/define spec file macros?
> Then it would be possible to change the above to[AFAIR]:
>
> %{?!global with_rubypick:%global with_rubypick 1}
>
> And then override it on module to 0.
>
> Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong.
>
> Pavel
>
> >
> > Because it is uncertainly when systemtap module will be prepared
> or not right
> > now.
> >
> > Is it possible to update ruby.spec for that?
> >
> > Jun
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Jun Aruga [e-mail] 
> IRC: jaruga, Office: TPB(Technology Park Brno) Building C 1F, Brno,
> Czech Republic
>
> ruby-sig mailing list -- [e-mail]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [e-mail]

[Jun Aruga]

Vit,

I will just create BZ for that.
I would like to ask you guys for the task.
If ruby.spec has a macro that ruby does not depends on systemtap, I am fine
for any way. Please implement it as you like.

Jun

On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 7:42 AM, Vít Ondruch  wrote:
> Dne 17.10.2017 v 07:33 Jun Aruga napsal(a):
>
> Hi,
> > I think it makes sense. Please either open ticket in BZ or send a PR in
>
> Pagure.
>
> OK I will open ticket in BZ and send the PR in Pagure.
>
> One or the other is enough, you won't get more attention opening PR as
> well as BZ ticket.
>
> I am not sure that "module capability"'s meaning.
> But the macro variable is defined as a module scope.
> Ref. https://src.fedoraproject.org/modules/perl/blob/master/f/
> perl.yaml#_161
> > %{?!global with_rubypick:%global with_rubypick 1}
>
> I am not sure if your mentioned code is correct.
>
> Of course the first "global" should not be there, but you get the picture
> ...
>
> Anyway, the details are probably better to discuss in the PR (as soon as
> it is sent), otherwise this is just academic ...
>
> V.
>
> I am going to refer below code that we know as a bootstrap logic, and also
> refer above Perl's logic.
>
> %{?_with_bootstrap: %global bootstrap 1}
>
> Jun
>
> On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 12:39 PM, Pavel Valena  wrote:
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Vít Ondruch" 
> > > To: [e-mail]
> > > Sent: Monday, October 16, 2017 9:56:44 AM
> > > Subject: Re: A macro to build rpms/ruby without systemtap dependency
> > >
> > > I think it makes sense. Please either open ticket in BZ or send a PR in
> > > Pagure.
> > >
> > > Thx
> > >
> > > Vít
> > >
> > > Dne 15.10.2017 v 11:00 Jun Aruga napsal(a):
> > >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I am working for ruby module.
> > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/modules/ruby
> > >
> > > I want a macro definition to build the ruby without systemtap rpm (+
> >
> > dtrace
> > > command), such as below macro.
> > >
> > > %global with_rubypick 1
> >
> > Is it not a module capability to change/define spec file macros?
> > Then it would be possible to change the above to[AFAIR]:
> >
> > %{?!global with_rubypick:%global with_rubypick 1}
> >
> > And then override it on module to 0.
> >
> > Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong.
> >
> > Pavel
> > > Because it is uncertainly when systemtap module will be prepared or not
> >
> > right
> > > now.
> > >
> > > Is it possible to update ruby.spec for that?
> > >
> > > Jun
>
> --
> Jun Aruga [e-mail]
> IRC: jaruga, Office: TPB(Technology Park Brno) Building C 1F, Brno, Czech
> Republic
>
> ruby-sig mailing list -- [e-mail]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [e-mail]
>
> ruby-sig mailing list -- [e-mail]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [e-mail]

[Jun Aruga]

Created BZ.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1502944

On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 8:16 AM, Jun Aruga  wrote:
> Vit,
>
> I will just create BZ for that.
> I would like to ask you guys for the task.
> If ruby.spec has a macro that ruby does not depends on systemtap, I am
> fine for any way. Please implement it as you like.
>
> Jun
>
> On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 7:42 AM, Vít Ondruch  wrote:
> > Dne 17.10.2017 v 07:33 Jun Aruga napsal(a):
> >
> > Hi,
> > > I think it makes sense. Please either open ticket in BZ or send a PR in
> >
> > Pagure.
> >
> > OK I will open ticket in BZ and send the PR in Pagure.
> >
> > One or the other is enough, you won't get more attention opening PR as
> > well as BZ ticket.
> >
> > I am not sure that "module capability"'s meaning.
> > But the macro variable is defined as a module scope.
> > Ref. https://src.fedoraproject.org/modules/perl/blob/master/f/per
> > l.yaml#_161
> > > %{?!global with_rubypick:%global with_rubypick 1}
> >
> > I am not sure if your mentioned code is correct.
> >
> > Of course the first "global" should not be there, but you get the picture
> > ...
> >
> > Anyway, the details are probably better to discuss in the PR (as soon as
> > it is sent), otherwise this is just academic ...
> >
> > V.
> >
> > I am going to refer below code that we know as a bootstrap logic, and
> > also refer above Perl's logic.
> >
> > %{?_with_bootstrap: %global bootstrap 1}
> >
> > Jun
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 12:39 PM, Pavel Valena 
> > wrote:
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "Vít Ondruch" 
> > > > To: [e-mail]
> > > > Sent: Monday, October 16, 2017 9:56:44 AM
> > > > Subject: Re: A macro to build rpms/ruby without systemtap dependency
> > > >
> > > > I think it makes sense. Please either open ticket in BZ or send a PR in
> > > > Pagure.
> > > >
> > > > Thx
> > > >
> > > > Vít
> > > >
> > > > Dne 15.10.2017 v 11:00 Jun Aruga napsal(a):
> > > >
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > I am working for ruby module.
> > > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/modules/ruby
> > > >
> > > > I want a macro definition to build the ruby without systemtap rpm (+
> > >
> > > dtrace
> > > > command), such as below macro.
> > > >
> > > > %global with_rubypick 1
> > >
> > > Is it not a module capability to change/define spec file macros?
> > > Then it would be possible to change the above to[AFAIR]:
> > >
> > > %{?!global with_rubypick:%global with_rubypick 1}
> > >
> > > And then override it on module to 0.
> > >
> > > Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong.
> > >
> > > Pavel
> > > > Because it is uncertainly when systemtap module will be prepared or
> > >
> > > not right
> > > > now.
> > > >
> > > > Is it possible to update ruby.spec for that?
> > > >
> > > > Jun
> >
> > --
> > Jun Aruga [e-mail]
> > IRC: jaruga, Office: TPB(Technology Park Brno) Building C 1F, Brno, Czech
> > Republic
> >
> > ruby-sig mailing list -- [e-mail]
> > To unsubscribe send an email to [e-mail]
> >
> > ruby-sig mailing list -- [e-mail]
> > To unsubscribe send an email to [e-mail]
>
> --
> Jun Aruga [e-mail]
> IRC: jaruga, Office: TPB(Technology Park Brno) Building C 1F, Brno, Czech
> Republic