Ruby on Rails 8

[Vít Ondruch]

Hi,

I am slowly working toward update of Ruby on Rails to version 8. The 
updated packages are available here for testing:

https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/vondruch/ror8/packages/

and I hope that all of them have opened PR with a changes. Also, I have 
put together change proposal:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Ruby_on_Rails_8.0

Feel free to provide feedback and I'd be more then happy if anybody else 
join the effort. Right now, I try to rebuild all the packages and check 
what the updated Rails are going to break. Started the MPB rebuild here:

https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/vondruch/ror8-mpb/packages/

But I am not really sure how well this proceed.

Cheers,

Vít

[Vít Ondruch]

Dne 09. 06. 25 v 16:29 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
> Hi,
>
> I am slowly working toward update of Ruby on Rails to version 8. The 
> updated packages are available here for testing:
>
> https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/vondruch/ror8/packages/
>
> and I hope that all of them have opened PR with a changes. Also, I 
> have put together change proposal:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Ruby_on_Rails_8.0
>
> Feel free to provide feedback and I'd be more then happy if anybody 
> else join the effort. Right now, I try to rebuild all the packages and 
> check what the updated Rails are going to break. Started the MPB 
> rebuild here:
>
> https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/vondruch/ror8-mpb/packages/

Trying to rebuild dependencies, so far struggling with Rack 3.x, which 
is required by RoR8. E.g.:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2371181

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2371179

but there is more. Fixing rubygem-puma right now, which is similar issue 
to YARD due to `rackup` command being split into separate package.

Vít
> But I am not really sure how well this proceed.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Vít

[Vít Ondruch]

Dne 09. 06. 25 v 18:17 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
> Dne 09. 06. 25 v 16:29 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am slowly working toward update of Ruby on Rails to version 8. The 
> > updated packages are available here for testing:
> >
> > https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/vondruch/ror8/packages/
> >
> > and I hope that all of them have opened PR with a changes. Also, I 
> > have put together change proposal:
> >
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Ruby_on_Rails_8.0
> >
> > Feel free to provide feedback and I'd be more then happy if anybody 
> > else join the effort. Right now, I try to rebuild all the packages 
> > and check what the updated Rails are going to break. Started the MPB 
> > rebuild here:
> >
> > https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/vondruch/ror8-mpb/packages/
>
> Trying to rebuild dependencies, so far struggling with Rack 3.x, which 
> is required by RoR8. E.g.:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2371181
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2371179
>
> but there is more. Fixing rubygem-puma right now, which is similar 
> issue to YARD due to `rackup` command being split into separate package.

If somebody had some spare time, I'd appreciate help with rubygem-ethon:

https://github.com/typhoeus/ethon/issues/243

I am kind of out of ideas, where the `body` content is lost. To me, it 
seems unlikely to be lost on "sender" side (how the data are fed into 
CURL is a bit tricky), but as far as I can see, it is lost already 
somewhere in WEBRick on the "server" side.

Vít
> Vít
> > But I am not really sure how well this proceed.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Vít

[Vít Ondruch]

Dne 16. 06. 25 v 10:57 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
> Dne 09. 06. 25 v 18:17 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
> > Dne 09. 06. 25 v 16:29 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I am slowly working toward update of Ruby on Rails to version 8. The 
> > > updated packages are available here for testing:
> > >
> > > https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/vondruch/ror8/packages/
> > >
> > > and I hope that all of them have opened PR with a changes. Also, I 
> > > have put together change proposal:
> > >
> > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Ruby_on_Rails_8.0
> > >
> > > Feel free to provide feedback and I'd be more then happy if anybody 
> > > else join the effort. Right now, I try to rebuild all the packages 
> > > and check what the updated Rails are going to break. Started the MPB 
> > > rebuild here:
> > >
> > > https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/vondruch/ror8-mpb/packages/
> >
> > Trying to rebuild dependencies, so far struggling with Rack 3.x, 
> > which is required by RoR8. E.g.:
> >
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2371181
> >
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2371179
> >
> > but there is more. Fixing rubygem-puma right now, which is similar 
> > issue to YARD due to `rackup` command being split into separate package.
>
> If somebody had some spare time, I'd appreciate help with rubygem-ethon:
>
> https://github.com/typhoeus/ethon/issues/243
>
> I am kind of out of ideas, where the `body` content is lost. To me, it 
> seems unlikely to be lost on "sender" side (how the data are fed into 
> CURL is a bit tricky), but as far as I can see, it is lost already 
> somewhere in WEBRick on the "server" side.

Ok, have made some progress. It seems this might be issue somewhere 
between Sinatra and Rackup WEBrick handler. More details are here:

https://github.com/sinatra/sinatra/issues/2112

It seems that Sinatra has tried to drop WEBrick support as well as Rack 
tried to deprecate WEBrick, so who knows what is the best solution:

https://github.com/sinatra/sinatra/commit/3f6c57780b4f77c1439004a949ea2b3d80...

https://github.com/rack/rackup/pull/23

But in any case, it seems more to be test error then anything else.

Vít
> Vít
> > Vít
> > > But I am not really sure how well this proceed.
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > >
> > > Vít

[Vít Ondruch]

Dne 17. 06. 25 v 19:01 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
> Dne 16. 06. 25 v 10:57 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
> > Dne 09. 06. 25 v 18:17 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
> > > Dne 09. 06. 25 v 16:29 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I am slowly working toward update of Ruby on Rails to version 8. 
> > > > The updated packages are available here for testing:
> > > >
> > > > https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/vondruch/ror8/packages/
> > > >
> > > > and I hope that all of them have opened PR with a changes. Also, I 
> > > > have put together change proposal:
> > > >
> > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Ruby_on_Rails_8.0
> > > >
> > > > Feel free to provide feedback and I'd be more then happy if anybody 
> > > > else join the effort. Right now, I try to rebuild all the packages 
> > > > and check what the updated Rails are going to break. Started the 
> > > > MPB rebuild here:
> > > >
> > > > https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/vondruch/ror8-mpb/packages/
> > >
> > > Trying to rebuild dependencies, so far struggling with Rack 3.x, 
> > > which is required by RoR8. E.g.:
> > >
> > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2371181
> > >
> > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2371179
> > >
> > > but there is more. Fixing rubygem-puma right now, which is similar 
> > > issue to YARD due to `rackup` command being split into separate 
> > > package.
> >
> > If somebody had some spare time, I'd appreciate help with rubygem-ethon:
> >
> > https://github.com/typhoeus/ethon/issues/243
> >
> > I am kind of out of ideas, where the `body` content is lost. To me, 
> > it seems unlikely to be lost on "sender" side (how the data are fed 
> > into CURL is a bit tricky), but as far as I can see, it is lost 
> > already somewhere in WEBRick on the "server" side.
>
> Ok, have made some progress. It seems this might be issue somewhere 
> between Sinatra and Rackup WEBrick handler. More details are here:
>
> https://github.com/sinatra/sinatra/issues/2112
>
> It seems that Sinatra has tried to drop WEBrick support as well as 
> Rack tried to deprecate WEBrick, so who knows what is the best solution:
>
> https://github.com/sinatra/sinatra/commit/3f6c57780b4f77c1439004a949ea2b3d80...
>
> https://github.com/rack/rackup/pull/23
>
> But in any case, it seems more to be test error then anything else.

Thinking about this further, I think this is test issue on Ethon side 
and it is reasonably safe to disable the failing tests for now. However, 
another option is also to get rid of Ethon entirely, because

1) it is not clear if it is properly maintained:

https://github.com/typhoeus/ethon/issues/241

https://github.com/typhoeus/ethon/graphs/contributors

2) The only real dependency IMHO is pcs:

~~~

$ ~/scripts/whatrequires ethon
Updating and loading repositories:
Repositories loaded.
pcs-0:0.12.0-1.fc42.noarch
pcs-0:0.12.0-1.fc42.src
rubygem-ethon-doc-0:0.15.0-9.fc42.noarch
rubygem-typhoeus-0:1.4.0-13.fc42.noarch
rubygem-typhoeus-0:1.4.0-13.fc42.src

~~~

Because Typhoeus is typically just build dependency

~~~

$ ~/scripts/whatrequires typhoeus
Updating and loading repositories:
Repositories loaded.
rubygem-faraday-0:1.0.1-16.fc42.src
rubygem-jekyll-feed-0:0.17.0-7.fc42.src
rubygem-typhoeus-doc-0:1.4.0-13.fc42.noarch
rubygem-webmock-0:3.23.1-3.fc42.src
~~~

The test in e.g. jekyll-feed fails anyway. Webmock uses Typhoeus as one 
of many adapters. Similarly to Faraday. I think that the Typhoeus was 
extracted in to separate library for Faraday 2. And maybe we should even 
get rid of Faraday, which is used only by vagrant-digitalocean and that 
might be just for historic reasons.

But let me also check Typhoeus first, which currently fails in my 
testing. It seems because the `Rackup` split.

Vít
> Vít
> > Vít
> > > Vít
> > > > But I am not really sure how well this proceed.
> > > >
> > > > Cheers,
> > > >
> > > > Vít

[Vít Ondruch]

Hi,

The change was approved by FESCo, so I'll slowly start with rebuild in 
`f43-build-side-115215` side tag.

Cheers,

Vít

Dne 09. 06. 25 v 16:29 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
> Hi,
>
> I am slowly working toward update of Ruby on Rails to version 8. The 
> updated packages are available here for testing:
>
> https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/vondruch/ror8/packages/
>
> and I hope that all of them have opened PR with a changes. Also, I 
> have put together change proposal:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Ruby_on_Rails_8.0
>
> Feel free to provide feedback and I'd be more then happy if anybody 
> else join the effort. Right now, I try to rebuild all the packages and 
> check what the updated Rails are going to break. Started the MPB 
> rebuild here:
>
> https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/vondruch/ror8-mpb/packages/
>
> But I am not really sure how well this proceed.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Vít

[Vít Ondruch]

Dne 16. 07. 25 v 16:45 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
> Hi,
>
> The change was approved by FESCo, so I'll slowly start with rebuild in 
> `f43-build-side-115215` side tag.

The progress can be seen here:

https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/builds?inherited=0&tagID=115215&...

Vít
> Cheers,
>
> Vít
>
> Dne 09. 06. 25 v 16:29 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am slowly working toward update of Ruby on Rails to version 8. The 
> > updated packages are available here for testing:
> >
> > https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/vondruch/ror8/packages/
> >
> > and I hope that all of them have opened PR with a changes. Also, I 
> > have put together change proposal:
> >
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Ruby_on_Rails_8.0
> >
> > Feel free to provide feedback and I'd be more then happy if anybody 
> > else join the effort. Right now, I try to rebuild all the packages 
> > and check what the updated Rails are going to break. Started the MPB 
> > rebuild here:
> >
> > https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/vondruch/ror8-mpb/packages/
> >
> > But I am not really sure how well this proceed.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Vít

[Vít Ondruch]

And finally, update has been submitted:

https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2025-203b7db566

Vít

Dne 16. 07. 25 v 17:55 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
> Dne 16. 07. 25 v 16:45 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
> > Hi,
> >
> > The change was approved by FESCo, so I'll slowly start with rebuild 
> > in `f43-build-side-115215` side tag.
>
> The progress can be seen here:
>
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/builds?inherited=0&tagID=115215&...
>
> Vít
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Vít
> >
> > Dne 09. 06. 25 v 16:29 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I am slowly working toward update of Ruby on Rails to version 8. The 
> > > updated packages are available here for testing:
> > >
> > > https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/vondruch/ror8/packages/
> > >
> > > and I hope that all of them have opened PR with a changes. Also, I 
> > > have put together change proposal:
> > >
> > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Ruby_on_Rails_8.0
> > >
> > > Feel free to provide feedback and I'd be more then happy if anybody 
> > > else join the effort. Right now, I try to rebuild all the packages 
> > > and check what the updated Rails are going to break. Started the MPB 
> > > rebuild here:
> > >
> > > https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/vondruch/ror8-mpb/packages/
> > >
> > > But I am not really sure how well this proceed.
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > >
> > > Vít