rawhide hits rpm-4.18.0 alpha - affecting gem based packaging

[Mamoru TASAKA]

Hello, all:

Now I was going to update rubygem-kramdown, resulting in build failure.
Then I've noticed that on rawhide, "rpm" was updated to rpm 4.18.0 alpha .
This seems to affect current gem based packaing of ours.

Mainly: "%setup -q" for foo-%version.gem places foo-%version.gemspec on
%{_sourcedir} with rpm 4.18.0 alpha . Previously (with rpm 4.17.x), gemspec file
was placed on %{_builddir}.

Maybe we may have to update packaging guideline, or modify gem2rpm.

Regards,
Mamoru

[Vít Ondruch]

Ups. I have reported this here:

https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2040

I don't think we should change anything. At least not at the moment.

Vít

Dne 26. 04. 22 v 12:38 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
> Hello, all:
>
> Now I was going to update rubygem-kramdown, resulting in build failure.
> Then I've noticed that on rawhide, "rpm" was updated to rpm 4.18.0 
> alpha .
> This seems to affect current gem based packaing of ours.
>
> Mainly: "%setup -q" for foo-%version.gem places foo-%version.gemspec on
> %{_sourcedir} with rpm 4.18.0 alpha . Previously (with rpm 4.17.x), 
> gemspec file
> was placed on %{_builddir}.
>
> Maybe we may have to update packaging guideline, or modify gem2rpm.
>
> Regards,
> Mamoru
> _______________________________________________
> ruby-sig mailing list -- [e-mail]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [e-mail]
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[e-mail].o...
> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Vít Ondruch]

This should be fixed by rpm-4.18.0-0.alpha1.6.fc37 and I already see 
Koschei reporting success for a lot of packages.

Vít

Dne 27. 04. 22 v 19:35 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
> Ups. I have reported this here:
>
> https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2040
>
> I don't think we should change anything. At least not at the moment.
>
> Vít
>
> Dne 26. 04. 22 v 12:38 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
> > Hello, all:
> >
> > Now I was going to update rubygem-kramdown, resulting in build failure.
> > Then I've noticed that on rawhide, "rpm" was updated to rpm 4.18.0 
> > alpha .
> > This seems to affect current gem based packaing of ours.
> >
> > Mainly: "%setup -q" for foo-%version.gem places foo-%version.gemspec on
> > %{_sourcedir} with rpm 4.18.0 alpha . Previously (with rpm 4.17.x), 
> > gemspec file
> > was placed on %{_builddir}.
> >
> > Maybe we may have to update packaging guideline, or modify gem2rpm.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Mamoru
> > _______________________________________________
> > ruby-sig mailing list -- [e-mail]
> > To unsubscribe send an email to [e-mail]
> > Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> > List Archives: 
> > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[e-mail].o...
> > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
> > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure