guess we could omit the "for". "specifically" is good enough.
On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 6:30 PM Pavel Bar pbar@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 11:31 PM Nir Soffer nirsof@gmail.com wrote:
From: Amit Bawer abawer@redhat.com
From this point, all API tests for should PASS or xfail specifically.
Redundant "for". Or need to add something after "for". Suggestion if I understood you correctly: "specifically" --> "explicitly"
XPASS is only known for python 3 on read invalid 4k sector size test.
tests/python_test.py | 21 +-------------------- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tests/python_test.py b/tests/python_test.py index 7093aac..926a0f0 100644 --- a/tests/python_test.py +++ b/tests/python_test.py @@ -51,24 +51,21 @@ FILE_NAMES = [ reason="currently not supporting bytes paths")), ]
LOCKSPACE_OR_RESOURCE_NAMES = [ # Bytes are supported with python 2 and 3.
- pytest.param(
b"\xd7\x90",marks=pytest.mark.xfail(six.PY3, reason="bytes support notimplemented yet")),
- pytest.param(b"\xd7\x90"), # Python 2 also supports str. pytest.param( "\xd7\x90", marks=pytest.mark.skipif(six.PY3, reason="python 3 supports only
bytes")), # Python 2 also supports unicode with ascii content. pytest.param( u"ascii", marks=pytest.mark.skipif(six.PY3, reason="python 3 supports only bytes")), ]
-@pytest.mark.xfail(six.PY3, reason="lockspace/resource names in bytes are unsupported yet") @pytest.mark.parametrize("filename, encoding" , FILE_NAMES) @pytest.mark.parametrize("size,offset", [ # Smallest offset. (LOCKSPACE_SIZE, 0), # Large offset. @@ -105,11 +102,10 @@ def test_write_lockspace(tmpdir, sanlock_daemon, filename, encoding, size, offse # TODO: check more stuff here...
util.check_guard(path, size)-@pytest.mark.xfail(six.PY3, reason="lockspace/resource names in bytes are unsupported yet") @pytest.mark.parametrize("align", sanlock.ALIGN_SIZE) def test_write_lockspace_4k(user_4k_path, sanlock_daemon, align):
# Poison lockspace area, ensuring that previous tests will not breakthis # test, and sanlock does not write beyond the lockspace area. @@ -135,11 +131,10 @@ def test_write_lockspace_4k(user_4k_path, sanlock_daemon, align):
# Check that sanlock did not write beyond the lockspace area. util.check_guard(user_4k_path, align)-@pytest.mark.xfail(six.PY3, reason="lockspace/resource names in bytes are unsupported yet") def test_write_lockspace_4k_invalid_sector_size(sanlock_daemon, user_4k_path): with pytest.raises(sanlock.SanlockException) as e: sanlock.write_lockspace( b"ls_name", user_4k_path, iotimeout=1, sector=SECTOR_SIZE_512) assert e.value.errno == errno.EINVAL @@ -153,11 +148,10 @@ def test_read_lockspace_4k_invalid_sector_size(sanlock_daemon, user_4k_path): with pytest.raises(sanlock.SanlockException) as e: sanlock.read_lockspace(user_4k_path, sector=SECTOR_SIZE_512) assert e.value.errno == errno.EINVAL
-@pytest.mark.xfail(six.PY3, reason="lockspace/resource names in bytes are unsupported yet") @pytest.mark.parametrize("filename,encoding", FILE_NAMES) @pytest.mark.parametrize("size,offset", [ # Smallest offset. (MIN_RES_SIZE, 0), # Large offset. @@ -202,11 +196,10 @@ def test_write_resource(tmpdir, sanlock_daemon, filename, encoding, size, offset # TODO: check more stuff here...
util.check_guard(path, size)-@pytest.mark.xfail(six.PY3, reason="lockspace/resource names in bytes are unsupported yet") @pytest.mark.parametrize("align", sanlock.ALIGN_SIZE) def test_write_resource_4k(sanlock_daemon, user_4k_path, align): disks = [(user_4k_path, 0)]
# Poison resource area, ensuring that previous tests will not breakthis @@ -248,11 +241,10 @@ def test_write_resource_4k_invalid_sector_size(sanlock_daemon, user_4k_path): sanlock.write_resource( b"ls_name", b"res_name", disks, sector=SECTOR_SIZE_512) assert e.value.errno == errno.EINVAL
-@pytest.mark.xfail(six.PY3, reason="lockspace/resource names in bytes are unsupported yet") def test_read_resource_4k_invalid_sector_size(sanlock_daemon, user_4k_path): disks = [(user_4k_path, 0)]
sanlock.write_resource( b"ls_name",@@ -264,11 +256,10 @@ def test_read_resource_4k_invalid_sector_size(sanlock_daemon, user_4k_path): with pytest.raises(sanlock.SanlockException) as e: sanlock.read_resource(user_4k_path, sector=SECTOR_SIZE_512) assert e.value.errno == errno.EINVAL
-@pytest.mark.xfail(six.PY3, reason="lockspace/resource names in bytes are unsupported yet") def test_read_resource_owners_4k_invalid_sector_size( sanlock_daemon, user_4k_path): disks = [(user_4k_path, 0)]
sanlock.write_resource(@@ -282,11 +273,10 @@ def test_read_resource_owners_4k_invalid_sector_size( sanlock.read_resource_owners( b"ls_name", b"res_name", disks, sector=SECTOR_SIZE_512) assert e.value.errno == errno.EINVAL
-@pytest.mark.xfail(six.PY3, reason="lockspace/resource names in bytes are unsupported yet") def test_read_resource_owners_invalid_align_size(tmpdir, sanlock_daemon): path = str(tmpdir.join("path")) util.create_file(path, GiB) disks = [(path, 0)]
@@ -305,11 +295,10 @@ def test_read_resource_owners_invalid_align_size(tmpdir, sanlock_daemon): align=ALIGNMENT_2M, sector=SECTOR_SIZE_512) assert e.value.errno == errno.EINVAL
-@pytest.mark.xfail(six.PY3, reason="lockspace/resource names in bytes are unsupported yet") @pytest.mark.parametrize("size,offset", [ # Smallest offset. (MIN_RES_SIZE, 0), # Large offset. (LARGE_FILE_SIZE, LARGE_FILE_SIZE - MIN_RES_SIZE), @@ -350,11 +339,10 @@ def test_add_rem_lockspace(tmpdir, sanlock_daemon, size, offset):
lockspaces = sanlock.get_lockspaces() assert lockspaces == []-@pytest.mark.xfail(six.PY3, reason="lockspace/resource names in bytes are unsupported yet") def test_add_rem_lockspace_async(tmpdir, sanlock_daemon): path = str(tmpdir.join("ls_name")) util.create_file(path, MiB)
sanlock.write_lockspace(b"ls_name", path, iotimeout=1)@@ -387,11 +375,10 @@ def test_add_rem_lockspace_async(tmpdir, sanlock_daemon): # Once the lockspace was released, we expect to get False. acquired = sanlock.inq_lockspace(b"ls_name", 1, path, wait=True) assert acquired is False
-@pytest.mark.xfail(six.PY3, reason="lockspace/resource names in bytes are unsupported yet") @pytest.mark.parametrize("size,offset", [ # Smallest offset. (MIN_RES_SIZE, 0), # Large offset. (LARGE_FILE_SIZE, LARGE_FILE_SIZE - MIN_RES_SIZE), @@ -461,11 +448,10 @@ def test_acquire_release_resource(tmpdir, sanlock_daemon, size, offset):
owners = sanlock.read_resource_owners(b"ls_name", b"res_name", disks) assert owners == []-@pytest.mark.xfail(six.PY3, reason="lockspace/resource names in bytes are unsupported yet") @pytest.mark.parametrize("align, sector", [ # Invalid alignment (KiB, sanlock.SECTOR_SIZE[0]), # Invalid sector size (sanlock.ALIGN_SIZE[0], 8 * KiB), @@ -477,11 +463,10 @@ def test_write_lockspace_invalid_align_sector(
with pytest.raises(ValueError): sanlock.write_lockspace(b"ls_name", path, align=align,sector=sector)
-@pytest.mark.xfail(six.PY3, reason="lockspace/resource names in bytes are unsupported yet") @pytest.mark.parametrize("align, sector", [ # Invalid alignment (KiB, sanlock.SECTOR_SIZE[0]), # Invalid sector size (sanlock.ALIGN_SIZE[0], 8 * KiB), @@ -495,11 +480,10 @@ def test_write_resource_invalid_align_sector( with pytest.raises(ValueError): sanlock.write_resource( b"ls_name", b"res_name", disks, align=align, sector=sector)
-@pytest.mark.xfail(six.PY3, reason="lockspace/resource names in bytes are unsupported yet") @pytest.mark.parametrize("disk", [ # Not a tuple - unicode and bytes: "not a tuple", b"not a tuple", u'\u05e9\u05dc\u05d5\u05dd', @@ -550,31 +534,28 @@ def test_add_lockspace_parse_args(no_sanlock_daemon, name): def test_write_lockspace_parse_args(no_sanlock_daemon, name): with raises_sanlock_errno(): sanlock.write_lockspace(name, "ls_path")
-@pytest.mark.xfail(six.PY3, reason="lockspace/resource names in bytes are unsupported yet") @pytest.mark.parametrize("name", LOCKSPACE_OR_RESOURCE_NAMES) def test_write_resource_parse_args(no_sanlock_daemon, name): with raises_sanlock_errno(): sanlock.write_resource(name, b"res_name", [("disk_path",0)])
with raises_sanlock_errno(): sanlock.write_resource(b"ls_name", name, [("disk_path",0)])-@pytest.mark.xfail(six.PY3, reason="lockspace/resource names in bytes are unsupported yet") @pytest.mark.parametrize("name", LOCKSPACE_OR_RESOURCE_NAMES) def test_release_resource_parse_args(no_sanlock_daemon, name): with raises_sanlock_errno(): sanlock.release(name, b"res_name", [("disk_path",0)])
with raises_sanlock_errno(): sanlock.release(b"ls_name", name, [("disk_path",0)])-@pytest.mark.xfail(six.PY3, reason="lockspace/resource names in bytes are unsupported yet") @pytest.mark.parametrize("name", LOCKSPACE_OR_RESOURCE_NAMES) def test_read_resource_owners_parse_args(no_sanlock_daemon, name): with raises_sanlock_errno(): sanlock.read_resource_owners(name, b"res_name", [("disk_path",0)])
-- 2.17.2
sanlock-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org