scap-security-guide October 2018

scap-security-guide@lists.fedorahosted.org

11 participants
7 discussions

FIPS Checker
by Trevor Vaughan 30 Oct '18

30 Oct '18

Hi All, Does anyone know of a project that can correlate the running operating system with the latest information on the FIPS 140 approved products list. Basically, I'm looking for a command where I can run something like `fipscertified` and get back a `0` or `1` based on the result of the latest/updated data. Bonus points, I'd love to be able to point it at apps and have it tell me, but that's a long shot given the statically compiled wonderland we all seem to be living in these days. Thanks, Trevor -- Trevor Vaughan Vice President, Onyx Point, Inc (410) 541-6699 x788 -- This account not approved for unencrypted proprietary information --

5 10

Re: FIPS Checker
by Trevor Vaughan 29 Oct '18

29 Oct '18

Hey, doesn't bother me, we finally got TPM and trusted boot support integrated into SIMP ;-). Except for...well...the fact that UEFI doesn't Trusted Boot in RHEL (*sigh*). Trevor On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 4:30 PM Brent Kimberley <Brent.Kimberley(a)durham.ca> wrote: > Like Trusted computing: power-on-self-test, trusted core, trusted > interpreter measurements? > > > > *From:* Trevor Vaughan [mailto:tvaughan@onyxpoint.com] > *Sent:* Monday, October 29, 2018 4:24 PM > *To:* SCAP Security Guide <scap-security-guide(a)lists.fedorahosted.org> > *Subject:* Re: FIPS Checker > > > > Well, checking to see if the system is in FIPS mode at the kernel level is > pretty easy (fipscheck). > > > > I would like to know that it's actually the way the vendor intended but I > couldn't determine a good way to do that. Seems like something that the > vendors would want to supply/encourage for those customers that need it. > > > > On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 4:17 PM Mark Thacker <mthacker(a)redhat.com> wrote: > > AHHH. > > Well, checking the signatures of the RPMs verses what we posted in the > certification would be a start. (sorry, manual there unless you automate > using Ansible or OpenSCAP perhaps) > > You can check that the kernel is running in FIPS mode, of course, but I'm > not sure that's all you want to check. > > BTW : That process of checking that the system is configured in FIPS does > get easier in the future..... > > > > On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 4:03 PM Trevor Vaughan <tvaughan(a)onyxpoint.com> > wrote: > > Actually, Mark, you've kind of nailed it on the head for me. > > > > I would like to be able to know that the system is the way it's *supposed* > to be instead of just kind of doing my best and hoping that something > didn't break. > > > > I was hoping that the validated modules area would have an XML file or > something that could be downloaded and processed :-|. > > > > Anyway, it seems like it would be an appropriate addition to the SCAP > scans since there is already the requirement to be enabled being checked > for various profiles. I was just hoping that someone had magically created > it. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Trevor > > > > On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 3:59 PM Mark Thacker <mthacker(a)redhat.com> wrote: > > We've definitely talked about this and there isn't a clear programmatic > means to achieve this. > > Of course, we do log which specific version of the libraries that we build > and test against in our certification report. So, those could be used to > compare a running system against the certification report. > > > > Yes, I also understand that sometimes the desire is to be able to show > that CentOS or Fedora is NOT FIPS certified verses RHEL. Of course, that > assumes that the RHEL you are running on IS actually certified. > > > > On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 3:39 PM Gabe Alford <redhatrises(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > Outside of going to > https://csrc.nist.gov/projects/cryptographic-module-validation-program/vali… > > and clicking `search` with empty search parameters, don't know of anything. > > > > On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 1:33 PM Trevor Vaughan <tvaughan(a)onyxpoint.com> > wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > Does anyone know of a project that can correlate the running operating > system with the latest information on the FIPS 140 approved products list. > > > > Basically, I'm looking for a command where I can run something like > `fipscertified` and get back a `0` or `1` based on the result of the > latest/updated data. > > > > Bonus points, I'd love to be able to point it at apps and have it tell me, > but that's a long shot given the statically compiled wonderland we all seem > to be living in these days. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Trevor > > > -- > > Trevor Vaughan > Vice President, Onyx Point, Inc > > (410) 541-6699 x788 > > > -- This account not approved for unencrypted proprietary information -- > > _______________________________________________ > scap-security-guide mailing list -- > scap-security-guide(a)lists.fedorahosted.org > To unsubscribe send an email to > scap-security-guide-leave(a)lists.fedorahosted.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedorahosted.org/archives/list/scap-security-guide@lists.fedo… > > _______________________________________________ > scap-security-guide mailing list -- > scap-security-guide(a)lists.fedorahosted.org > To unsubscribe send an email to > scap-security-guide-leave(a)lists.fedorahosted.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedorahosted.org/archives/list/scap-security-guide@lists.fedo… > > > > > -- > > Mark Thacker > > Principal Technical Product Manager, Security, Red Hat Enterprise Linux > > Email: mthacker(a)redhat.com > > IRC / Freenode : mthacker > > Mobile: +1-214-636-7004 > > _______________________________________________ > scap-security-guide mailing list -- > scap-security-guide(a)lists.fedorahosted.org > To unsubscribe send an email to > scap-security-guide-leave(a)lists.fedorahosted.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedorahosted.org/archives/list/scap-security-guide@lists.fedo… > > > > -- > > Trevor Vaughan > Vice President, Onyx Point, Inc > > (410) 541-6699 x788 > > > -- This account not approved for unencrypted proprietary information -- > > _______________________________________________ > scap-security-guide mailing list -- > scap-security-guide(a)lists.fedorahosted.org > To unsubscribe send an email to > scap-security-guide-leave(a)lists.fedorahosted.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedorahosted.org/archives/list/scap-security-guide@lists.fedo… > > > > > -- > > Mark Thacker > > Principal Technical Product Manager, Security, Red Hat Enterprise Linux > > Email: mthacker(a)redhat.com > > IRC / Freenode : mthacker > > Mobile: +1-214-636-7004 > > _______________________________________________ > scap-security-guide mailing list -- > scap-security-guide(a)lists.fedorahosted.org > To unsubscribe send an email to > scap-security-guide-leave(a)lists.fedorahosted.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedorahosted.org/archives/list/scap-security-guide@lists.fedo… > > > > -- > > Trevor Vaughan > Vice President, Onyx Point, Inc > > (410) 541-6699 x788 > > > -- This account not approved for unencrypted proprietary information -- > THIS MESSAGE IS FOR THE USE OF THE INTENDED RECIPIENT(S) ONLY AND MAY > CONTAIN INFORMATION THAT IS PRIVILEGED, PROPRIETARY, CONFIDENTIAL, AND/OR > EXEMPT FROM DISCLOSURE UNDER ANY RELEVANT PRIVACY LEGISLATION. No rights to > any privilege have been waived. If you are not the intended recipient, you > are hereby notified that any review, re-transmission, dissemination, > distribution, copying, conversion to hard copy, taking of action in > reliance on or other use of this communication is strictly prohibited. If > you are not the intended recipient and have received this message in error, > please notify me by return e-mail and delete or destroy all copies of this > message. > _______________________________________________ > scap-security-guide mailing list -- > scap-security-guide(a)lists.fedorahosted.org > To unsubscribe send an email to > scap-security-guide-leave(a)lists.fedorahosted.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedorahosted.org/archives/list/scap-security-guide@lists.fedo… > -- Trevor Vaughan Vice President, Onyx Point, Inc (410) 541-6699 x788 -- This account not approved for unencrypted proprietary information --

1 0

open-scap.org down?
by Trevor Vaughan 29 Oct '18

29 Oct '18

I'm not able to access the site, is this a known issue? Thanks, Trevor -- Trevor Vaughan Vice President, Onyx Point, Inc (410) 541-6699 x788 -- This account not approved for unencrypted proprietary information --

2 3

Re: [Open-scap] Developing content for Oracle Linux
by Jan Cerny 22 Oct '18

22 Oct '18

Hi, I'm adding the scap-security-guide-list to the conversation because the openscap-list is about the scanner, not about the content. Jan Černý Security Technologies | Red Hat, Inc. ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Jan Cerny" <jcerny(a)redhat.com> > To: "Tina Rose" <tina.rose(a)oracle.com> > Cc: open-scap-list(a)redhat.com > Sent: Monday, October 22, 2018 9:03:20 AM > Subject: Re: [Open-scap] Developing content for Oracle Linux > > Hi Tina, > > Thank you for reaching us. There is ComplianceAsCode project (formerly known > as SCAP Security Guide) that provides SCAP content for various Linux > distributions. > > ComplianceAsCode is an open-source project and it's developed actively on > GitHub. > Here's the link: https://github.com/ComplianceAsCode/content > Check out the README there. > > ComplianceAsCode already has some SCAP content for Oracle Linux 7. It needs a > lot of > improvements, but it's a great place to start. It's possible to reuse a lot > of stuff > that is used in RHEL content. There is a person from Oracle, Ilya Okomin, > who used work on that. > > The process for sharing content with the community is to submit patches > via GitHub using pull requests. We are willing to provide feedback and help > your developers with that. > There is a developer guide that explains how the content is built: > https://github.com/ComplianceAsCode/content/blob/master/docs/manual/develop… > > Hopefully this helps. We're looking forward to hear from you soon. > > Regards > > Jan Černý > Security Technologies | Red Hat, Inc. > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Tina Rose" <tina.rose(a)oracle.com> > > To: open-scap-list(a)redhat.com > > Sent: Friday, October 19, 2018 7:38:45 PM > > Subject: [Open-scap] Developing content for Oracle Linux > > > > > > > > I had a customer request Open-SCAP content specific to Oracle Linux to > > complete STIG compliance. Can someone point me in the right direction to > > begin researching this request? Is there a process for creating and sharing > > content to the open-scap community? > > > > > > > > > > > > Tina Rose | Consulting Member of Technical Staff > > > > Office: +1 719 757 3203 > > > > Oracle Platform Integration MAA Team > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Open-scap-list mailing list > > Open-scap-list(a)redhat.com > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/open-scap-list > > _______________________________________________ > Open-scap-list mailing list > Open-scap-list(a)redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/open-scap-list

1 0

Issue with Repo GPG Checking
by Trevor Vaughan 20 Oct '18

20 Oct '18

Hi All, I've been re-roaming through the SSG and this is probably the first of a many part thread regarding different checks. TL;DR; The potential risk caused by enabling 'repo_gpgcheck' outweighs any potential benefit if TLS is enabled. In my opinion, the following check should *only* be enabled if all of your repositories are internally managed xccdf_org.ssgproject.content_rule_ensure_gpgcheck_repo_metadata. The reason for this is that YUM presently does not (to my knowledge) have any way to differentiate between package signing GPG keys and repo signing GPG keys. This means that if, for instance, I host my packages via some shared Nexus, then I have to add the Nexus GPG key to my trust list for the repo. I fundamentally do *not* want to do this! I shouldn't be allowing my Nexus maintainer to potentially install software on my system without my explicit knowledge. You should use TLS, and the repo should have a trusted certificate there and that should be sufficient for the metadata until RPM can tell the difference between these two certificates. Please let me know if I've missed something, but I don't remember seeing options to split out the two sets of certs. Additionally, this is marked as 'high' severity and that seems to be massive overkill considering that 1) the packages are still signed and validated and 2) TLS is required. -- Trevor Vaughan Vice President, Onyx Point, Inc (410) 541-6699 x788 -- This account not approved for unencrypted proprietary information --

7 20

Fedora updates for SCAP Security Guide 0.1.41
by Watson Yuuma Sato 01 Oct '18

01 Oct '18

Hello, I've proposed updates to Fedora packages for scap-security-guide-0.1.41. If you can, please, test and provide karma. Fedora 29 - https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-0d60f79d06 Fedora 28 - https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-bad4ea7d4f Thank you for your time and at karma. -- Watson Sato Security Technologies | Red Hat, Inc

1 0

SCAP Security Guide 0.1.41
by Watson Yuuma Sato 01 Oct '18

01 Oct '18

Hello everybody, We have the pleasure to announce release of SCAP Security Guide 0.1.41. Although it is named SCAP Security Guide, the project is now under ComplianceAsCode organization (https://github.com/ComplianceAsCode/content) For more on this move, see https://lists.fedorahosted.org/archives/list/scap-security-guide@lists.fedo… This release continues with fixes "under the hood", the checks and fixes are now better placed, in the same directory as the rule description. We also feature new Products and new Profiles, test coverage for the rules was significantly improved, along with testing capabilities of SSGTestSuite. Highlights of this release: - Improved test scenario coverage of rules - Improvements regarding content for Kubernetes for opencis-ocp-master Profile - Introduction of concept of stable Profiles - Addition of Ubuntu 1804 Product with ANSSI and standard Profiles - Addition of OSPP 4.2 Profile for Fedora - Addition of PCI-DSS Profile for Fedora - Possibility to manually debug test scenarios - Addition of Example Product - Support to evaluate test scenarios on container images - Introduction of SSG unit tests for build system functions - Reorganization of checks and fixes to be closer to rule description For a more detailed overview of changes (bug fixes, enhancements) implemented in this release, please have a look at more detailed changelog: * https://github.com/ComplianceAsCode/content/releases/tag/v0.1.41 Full changelog at: * https://github.com/ComplianceAsCode/content/issues?q=milestone%3A0.1.41 Zip archives with pre-built benchmarks in DataStream form: * https://github.com/ComplianceAsCode/content/releases/download/v0.1.41/scap-… (Zip archive using OVAL-5.11.1 language version) * https://github.com/ComplianceAsCode/content/releases/download/v0.1.41/scap-… (Zip archive using OVAL-5.10 language version only) Thank you to everyone who contributed with issues, patches and discussions! Happy hardening! -- Watson Sato Security Technologies | Red Hat, Inc

1 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

scap-security-guide October 2018