Re: BIND and HTTP STIGs

[Gabe Alford]

> Depends on how agnostic the content is.

It would just be primarily for the RHEL/Fedora products and derivatives i.e
CentOS, etc.

Gabe

On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 7:07 AM, Shawn Wells  wrote:
> Depends on how agnostic the content is.
>
> E.g the webmin is also meant to work on Gentoo/Ubuntu in addition to RHEL,
> so made sense for its own tree.
>
> --
> Shawn Wells
> Director, Innovation Programs
> [e-mail] | 443.534.0130
> @shawndwells
>
> On Mar 20, 2015, at 9:01 AM, Gabe Alford  wrote:
>
> Sorry user keyboard error.
>
> I am currently in the mist of securing some of my systems with the BIND
> and HTTP STIGs, and was wanting to add them back into the
> scap-security-guide content when I am done. My question is should there be
> a separate content tree like what we have for RHEL/6, RHEL/7, etc. but for
> BIND and HTTP, or should the XCCDF be added to
> RHEL/6/input/services/dns.xml and RHEL/6/input/services/http.xml?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Gabe
>
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 6:57 AM, Gabe Alford 
> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >     I am currently in the mist of securing some of my systems with
> >
> > the BIND and HTTP STIGs, and
>
> --
> SCAP Security Guide mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/scap-security-guide
> https://github.com/OpenSCAP/scap-security-guide/
>
> --
> SCAP Security Guide mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/scap-security-guide
> https://github.com/OpenSCAP/scap-security-guide/