> Depends on how agnostic the content is.

It would just be primarily for the RHEL/Fedora products and derivatives i.e CentOS, etc.

Gabe

On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 7:07 AM, Shawn Wells <shawn@redhat.com> wrote:
Depends on how agnostic the content is.

E.g the webmin is also meant to work on Gentoo/Ubuntu in addition to RHEL, so made sense for its own tree.

--
Shawn Wells
Director, Innovation Programs
@shawndwells

On Mar 20, 2015, at 9:01 AM, Gabe Alford <redhatrises@gmail.com> wrote:

Sorry user keyboard error.

I am currently in the mist of securing some of my systems with the BIND and HTTP STIGs, and was wanting to add them back into the scap-security-guide content when I am done. My question is should there be a separate content tree like what we have for RHEL/6, RHEL/7, etc. but for BIND and HTTP, or should the XCCDF be added to RHEL/6/input/services/dns.xml and RHEL/6/input/services/http.xml?

Thanks,

Gabe

On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 6:57 AM, Gabe Alford <redhatrises@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello,

        I am currently in the mist of securing some of my systems with the BIND and HTTP STIGs, and


--
SCAP Security Guide mailing list
scap-security-guide@lists.fedorahosted.org
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/scap-security-guide
https://github.com/OpenSCAP/scap-security-guide/