This commit was missed this morning when others of the kind got committed and ACKd by Shawn Wells. In the interest of preserving this information and working from the the same base, I'm submitting for ACK. See Shawn's commment below on the previous ACK:
"Given that we're converting the mappings from NIST over to the CCIs (which get us things like NIST 800-53 and OS SRG for free) these patches will have a short lifespan, however they do provide us with a foundation for identifying what potential CCIs the rules apply to. Ack for the patchset, so that these can provide a base for mapping to appropriate CCIs."
Willy Santos (1): Added 800-53 references where missing.
rhel6/src/input/system/permissions/partitions.xml | 14 +++++++------- 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
I ACK this too.
While the CCIs will likely cover a lot of the Rules (and implicitly provide 800-53), some might not be covered. So, direct mapping to 800-53 may have a longer lifespan for some rules.
Thanks!
On 04/26/2012 02:46 PM, Willy Santos wrote:
This commit was missed this morning when others of the kind got committed and ACKd by Shawn Wells. In the interest of preserving this information and working from the the same base, I'm submitting for ACK. See Shawn's commment below on the previous ACK:
"Given that we're converting the mappings from NIST over to the CCIs (which get us things like NIST 800-53 and OS SRG for free) these patches will have a short lifespan, however they do provide us with a foundation for identifying what potential CCIs the rules apply to. Ack for the patchset, so that these can provide a base for mapping to appropriate CCIs."
Willy Santos (1): Added 800-53 references where missing.
rhel6/src/input/system/permissions/partitions.xml | 14 +++++++------- 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
scap-security-guide mailing list scap-security-guide@lists.fedorahosted.org https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/scap-security-guide
Pushed, Thanks!
Willy Santos, RHCE Consultant Red Hat Consulting Cell: +1 (301) 254-7077 Email: wsantos@redhat.com
On 04/26/2012 03:19 PM, Jeffrey Blank wrote:
I ACK this too.
While the CCIs will likely cover a lot of the Rules (and implicitly provide 800-53), some might not be covered. So, direct mapping to 800-53 may have a longer lifespan for some rules.
Thanks!
On 04/26/2012 02:46 PM, Willy Santos wrote:
This commit was missed this morning when others of the kind got committed and ACKd by Shawn Wells. In the interest of preserving this information and working from the the same base, I'm submitting for ACK. See Shawn's commment below on the previous ACK:
"Given that we're converting the mappings from NIST over to the CCIs (which get us things like NIST 800-53 and OS SRG for free) these patches will have a short lifespan, however they do provide us with a foundation for identifying what potential CCIs the rules apply to. Ack for the patchset, so that these can provide a base for mapping to appropriate CCIs."
Willy Santos (1): Added 800-53 references where missing.
rhel6/src/input/system/permissions/partitions.xml | 14 +++++++------- 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
scap-security-guide mailing list scap-security-guide@lists.fedorahosted.org https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/scap-security-guide
scap-security-guide mailing list scap-security-guide@lists.fedorahosted.org https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/scap-security-guide
scap-security-guide@lists.fedorahosted.org
-
Jeffrey Blank -
Willy Santos