----------------------------------------
> Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2014 15:25:15 +0200
> From: jussilehtola(a)fedoraproject.org
> To: seb(a)boisvert.info
> CC: scitech(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> Subject: Re: Broken dependencies: Ray
>
> On Sun, 23 Feb 2014 07:58:25 -0500
> Sébastien Boisvert <seb(a)boisvert.info> wrote:
>
>> Hello SciTech group,
>>
>>
>> The Ray packages fails rawhide build (f21) because of mpich (again).
>> The last time, it was because the package mpich changed its name from
>> mpich2 to mpich.
>
> (clip)
>
>>> Ray has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
>>> On x86_64:
>>> Ray-mpich-2.1.0-8.fc21.x86_64 requires libmpichcxx.so.10()(64bit)
>>> Ray-mpich-2.1.0-8.fc21.x86_64 requires libmpich.so.10()(64bit)
>>> On i386:
>>> Ray-mpich-2.1.0-8.fc21.i686 requires libmpichcxx.so.10
>>> Ray-mpich-2.1.0-8.fc21.i686 requires libmpich.so.10
>>> On armhfp:
>>> Ray-mpich-2.1.0-8.fc21.armv7hl requires libmpichcxx.so.10
>>> Ray-mpich-2.1.0-8.fc21.armv7hl requires libmpich.so.10
>>> Please resolve this as soon as possible.
>
> No, this is because mpich has had an unannounced soname bump once
> again. Soname bumps break requirements, so all dependent packages have
> to be rebuilt.
>
I see. Do I need to change Ray's spec file ?
> Again, the mpich maintainer who did the bump has not informed about
> this.
>
>> In the repository, it has no f21 branch. [1]
>>
>> coreutils [2] does not also have the f21 branch.
>>
>> The git for maintainers documentation [3] refers to the admin request documentation
>> for creating branches [4]. Therefore, I understand that I don't get to create the
>> branch myself.
>>
>> Therefore, I suppose that the rawhide build is based on the master branch.
>
> Yes, rawhide is the master branch, and currently rawhide is f21. When
> f21 is branched, the master branch will become f22.
Thanks.
> --
> Susi Lehtola
> Fedora Project Contributor
> jussilehtola(a)fedoraproject.org