On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 10:10 PM, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade
<paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andrade(a)gmail.com> wrote:
2014-05-22 13:39 GMT-03:00 Thomas Spura
<tomspur(a)fedoraproject.org>:
> On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 6:35 PM, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade
> <paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andrade(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> 2014-05-22 12:32 GMT-03:00 Paul Howarth <paul(a)city-fan.org>:
>>> On 17/05/14 17:39, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade wrote:
>>>>
>>>> 2014-05-16 21:23 GMT-03:00 Paul Howarth <paul(a)city-fan.org>:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, 16 May 2014 12:37:19 -0300
>>>>> Paulo César Pereira de Andrade
>>>>> <paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andrade(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi sorry for adding the CC, but trying hard to get you attention
:-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2014-05-15 16:50 GMT-03:00 Paulo César Pereira de Andrade
>>>>>> <paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andrade(a)gmail.com>:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I am in the last steps on getting sagemath 6.2 working,
so,
>>>>>>> what should be done:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It would be better to coordinate the update, so...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> o Update to pari 2.7.0 -- optional
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> At least for sagemath it is ok to rebuild pari 2.7.0; I will
use
>>>>>> this patch:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
https://abf.rosalinux.ru/openmandriva/sagemath/blob/master/sagemath-pari2...
>>>>>> and drop this:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/sagemath.git/tree/sagemath-nopari2.6.p...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Note that dist-git now has pari 2.7.1 but it's not built yet;
that will
>>>>> change when the mass rebuild lands.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> For sagemath I can apply the patches to support pari 2.7 later, but
>>>> it probably would be better to build pari earlier. At least sagemath
>>>> is already broken for almost a month in rawhide due to other
>>>> dependencies.
>>>>
>>>> Can you rebuild pari in the next few days please? This would also
>>>> ensure that the mass rebuild would not let pass broken packages
>>>> in case it builds packages that needs pari before pari itself.
>>>
>>>
>>> I've now built pari 2.7.1 in Rawhide. I kept the old library around for
now
>>> to avoid broken deps whilst packages are migrated to the new version.
>>
>> Many thanks! Major issue now for sagemath is ipython, that I hope should
>> be resolved and available soon.
>
> I got now the unbundling exception approved and want to update
> python-tornado after the mass rebuild is over. Then I'll update
> ipython as ipthon requires a newer python-tornado.
>
> Would also ipython 2.X be fine, or do you must have version 1.2.1?
> I was already working on the 2.X series before you were writing about
> version 1.2.1... :/
It starts and can start the notebook without problems, so I think it is safe.
Only one warning:
---%<---
$ sage
┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Sage Version 6.2, Release Date: 2014-05-06 │
│ Type "notebook()" for the browser-based notebook interface. │
│ Type "help()" for help. │
└────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
WARNING: Hook shutdown_hook is deprecated. Use the atexit module instead.
sage:
---%<---
I have no reasons to think it could cause problems.
Great!
I'll then now prepare the pyhton-tornado update for next week and next
is ipython.
Should I let you know, when I have a scratch build of ipython before
updating it in rawhide, so you can do the final testings?
Greetings,
Tom