Re: [fedora-arm] Secondary Arch Status reports
by Manas Saksena
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 5:57 AM, Josh Boyer <jwboyer(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> In an effort to get a better understanding of how the Secondary Arch work
> is progresing in Fedora, FESCo would like to get some information on how
> things currently are, what work is being done, etc.
>
> To start with, a brief recap of where your Arch is at compared to the
> primary arches would be great. Feel free to highlight any hurdles that
> are in the way, etc.
>
> Ideally, we'd like to get this information about once a month in a brief
> status report. For now there is nothing formal required. Our hope is that
> as we continue to grow in this area, we can better coordinate with the other
> Fedora groups (like Rel-Eng) and make sure we have smooth Secondary Arch
> releases, etc.
>
> Thanks for you time and I look forward to hearing from you.
>
> josh
For ARM architecture...
We had a reasonably complete F8 build, but the project stalled after that
and we never built F9, although many of the patches that were needed to
build successfully made it into the fedora cvs.
We are now in the process of building F10 packages, and hopefully will
catch up with the current development.
We are not yet integrated into the secondary-arch infrastructure. Not sure
what the state of the secondary-arch infrastructure support (koji etc.) is, &
what will be needed to integrate into it.
Regards,
Manas
15 years, 4 months
- 1
- 0
Re: Secondary Arch Status reports
by Brad Hinson
Josh Boyer wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> In an effort to get a better understanding of how the Secondary Arch work
> is progresing in Fedora, FESCo would like to get some information on how
> things currently are, what work is being done, etc.
>
> To start with, a brief recap of where your Arch is at compared to the
> primary arches would be great. Feel free to highlight any hurdles that
> are in the way, etc.
>
> Ideally, we'd like to get this information about once a month in a brief
> status report. For now there is nothing formal required. Our hope is that
> as we continue to grow in this area, we can better coordinate with the other
> Fedora groups (like Rel-Eng) and make sure we have smooth Secondary Arch
> releases, etc.
>
> Thanks for you time and I look forward to hearing from you.
>
> josh
(resend to correct lists)
s390:
We have a full F9 tree and working install images created from a
manually patched anaconda. Currently finalizing patches to anaconda and
initscripts to get installable images automatically through pungi. Next
steps include finalized buildinstall/initrd patch, package signing, and
integration with http://secondary.fedoraproject.org .
Koji hub is up with two builders, s390x (64-bit) only. Have begun
building F10 packages for buildroot.
Dan created the fedora-s390x mailing list today.
--
Brad Hinson <bhinson(a)redhat.com>
Sr. Support Engineer Lead, System z
Red Hat, Inc.
(919) 754-4198
www.redhat.com/z
15 years, 4 months
- 1
- 0
- ← Newer
- 1
- Older →