[Bug 217950] New: CVE-2006-6169: gnupg2 < 2.0.1 buffer overflow

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217950

           Summary: CVE-2006-6169: gnupg2 < 2.0.1 buffer overflow
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: fc6
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: gnupg2
        AssignedTo: rdieter(a)math.unl.edu
        ReportedBy: ville.skytta(a)iki.fi
         QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
                CC: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org,fedora-security-
                    list(a)redhat.com


http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2006-6171

"Buffer overflow in the ask_outfile_name function in openfile.c for GnuPG (gpg)
1.4 and 2.0, when running interactively, might allow attackers to execute
arbitrary code via messages that cause the make_printable_string function to
return a longer string than expected while constructing a prompt."

FE[3456] seem affected, devel looks ok.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

[Bug 217950] CVE-2006-6169: gnupg2 < 2.0.1 buffer overflow

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: CVE-2006-6169: gnupg2 < 2.0.1 buffer overflow


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217950


rdieter(a)math.unl.edu changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED




------- Additional Comments From rdieter(a)math.unl.edu  2006-11-30 16:19 EST -------
Yucky. FC-6+ should already be fine.  Older releases need patching.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

[Bug 217950] CVE-2006-6169: gnupg2 < 2.0.1 buffer overflow

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: CVE-2006-6169: gnupg2 < 2.0.1 buffer overflow


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217950





------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta(a)iki.fi  2006-11-30 17:13 EST -------
Unless I'm missing something, the upstream fix is not in FE6's 2.0.1rc1, but
only in devel's 2.0.1 final.
http://cvs.gnupg.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/branches/STABLE-BRANCH-1-4/g10/o...


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

[Bug 217950] CVE-2006-6169: gnupg2 < 2.0.1 buffer overflow

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: CVE-2006-6169: gnupg2 < 2.0.1 buffer overflow


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217950





------- Additional Comments From rdieter(a)math.unl.edu  2006-12-01 07:40 EST -------
OK, though that's contrary to what the dev's said on the gpg-dev mailing list, I
was planning on upgrading FC-6 to 2.0.1 final asap anyway.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

[Bug 217950] CVE-2006-6169: gnupg2 < 2.0.1 buffer overflow

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: CVE-2006-6169: gnupg2 < 2.0.1 buffer overflow


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217950


rdieter(a)math.unl.edu changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |NEXTRELEASE




------- Additional Comments From rdieter(a)math.unl.edu  2006-12-01 10:02 EST -------
Okey dokie, builds queue'd for remaining vulnerable releases:

FC-6+:
* Wed Nov 29 2006 Rex Dieter <rexdieter[AT]users.sf.net> 2.0.1-1
- gnupg-2.0.1
- CVE-2006-6169 (bug #217950)

FC-3/4/5:
* Fri Dec 01 2006 Rex Dieter <rexdieter[AT]users.sf.net> 1.9.22-8
- CVE-2006-6169 (bug #217950)
- --disable-optmization on 64bit archs

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.