Re: Ongoing open-firewall discussion

[Eric Christensen]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 03:02:45PM +0100, Jan Rusnacko wrote:
>  Hey guys,
>  
>  given that there is quite heated discussion about open by default firewall, is this
> something we want to contribute to (as a team) ? Do you think we a) can and b) should come
> with a statement and join the discussion ? 
Moving this to the general security list...

Did FESCo really approve this?  I can't imagine someone actually approving such a dumb
request.

- -- Eric

- --------------------------------------------------
Eric "Sparks" Christensen
Fedora Project

sparks(a)fedoraproject.org - sparks(a)redhat.com
097C 82C3 52DF C64A 50C2  E3A3 8076 ABDE 024B B3D1
- --------------------------------------------------
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1
>
> iQGcBAEBCgAGBQJUhxgPAAoJEB/kgVGp2CYvR7EL/R9U/mTaq+/4mGOaopZWiihV
> +LusWiw4GguG7x4zGXtHe6FQGsspMbniuj7nmW5n+PxQyn4Du3Zk90jtQ4RwKUU5
> 53OCxQvKtOBZveWmHATXSEY/JNv8eCyuVkjO3Sc4ZQDewcpMGLAt5D50dU6vcOVo
> a74E7t2TwpLUgzm4QwfFWMbVZtI8sdTc+VnBLZL+GF/ZAkHd0eiyQtPcgvebaRY9
> 68F3MjC3IwyVaQTa7LG1bhmMX/t96TinAVDKG45aS5wfkNnYFFoYVUuvxTtBvWS7
> ZT3JZ8BjjkAsCh03p9JangGsWSEeN2AZTZ+qEPt6Z4l4qy88yrbE8ZPXv4KMEqTt
> oXFZHOZg0X5/OulPe/Q3rsohe7hpMLdBmhvjfNkEnj7tx8R/VhUBwqt4I/AYhODQ
> CX0FgDRf9Qa9AMrmfP+/KUvuTNC0pylVu0IegRmyizlvmqj1ltEuXauxwJsnLFKN
> I5v/Ms4m7u2+WJloza2gUfzP+Zcup2JPbH6D7OVWJg==
> =w7aN
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Ongoing open-firewall discussion

[Stephen John Smoogen]

On 9 December 2014 at 08:41, Eric H. Christensen <sparks(a)fedoraproject.org&gt;
wrote:

>  -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>  Hash: SHA512
>
>  On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 03:02:45PM +0100, Jan Rusnacko wrote:
>  > Hey guys,
>  >
>  > given that there is quite heated discussion about open by default
>  firewall, is this something we want to contribute to (as a team) ? Do you
>  think we a) can and b) should come with a statement and join the discussion
>  ?
>
>  Moving this to the general security list...
>
>  Did FESCo really approve this?  I can't imagine someone actually approving
>  such a dumb request.
>
>  
It would help if people slowed down and quit using pronouns.

What exactly is this?
What was the request you are thinking about and what is the request the
other person is talking about...

if you can get those explained by both parties and agreed on.. then we can
move to if this is 'dumb' or not. Until then it is heated emotion clouding
any useful discussion or debate. [Firing torpedoes without co-ordinates
sounds great in movies.. but not in real life.]


>  
-- 
Stephen J Smoogen.