On Mon, 8 Sep 2008 15:26:03 +0200 Till Maas <opensource(a)till.name>
On Monday 08 September 2008 12:23:40 Tomas Hoger wrote:
> I also did some minor changes to your update requests. One thing
> that remains quite unclear with them is why libHX update is
> included in the same update request.
The libHX update is included there, because the pam_mount update
needs the newer libHX library. Afaik both packages need to be in one
update to make sure they are both synced to the server at the same
time. LibHX is afaik only used by the upstream maintainer for his
Sure, that's understandable. I just prefer to have that explicit in
the update notes, so I added it there.
Tomas Hoger / Red Hat Security Response Team