selinux labels changed by restorecon after clean install

[Chris Murphy]

After a clean install of F23 server from netinstall media, running
restorecon I get a pile of changed files. Why aren't they correct to
begin with?

Examples:

restorecon reset
/usr/lib/modules/4.2.0-0.rc8.git0.1.fc23.i686/modules.symbols context
system_u:object_r:modules_object_t:s0->system_u:object_r:modules_dep_t:s0

restorecon reset /boot/System.map-4.2.0-0.rc8.git0.1.fc23.i686 context
system_u:object_r:modules_object_t:s0->system_u:object_r:system_map_t:s0

restorecon reset /boot/vmlinuz-4.2.0-0.rc8.git0.1.fc23.i686 context
system_u:object_r:modules_object_t:s0->system_u:object_r:boot_t:s0

restorecon reset /var/lib/os-prober/labels context
unconfined_u:object_r:user_tmp_t:s0->unconfined_u:object_r:bootloader_var_lib_t:s0

restorecon reset /var/log/dnf.log context
system_u:object_r:rpm_log_t:s0->system_u:object_r:var_log_t:s0

restorecon reset
/var/cache/dnf/updates-testing-200adbd074da487f/repodata/repomd.xml
context system_u:object_r:rpm_tmp_t:s0->system_u:object_r:rpm_var_cache_t:s0

So I asked about it on the test@ list and AdamW says it's the same
with Fedora 22, so it's not a new thing.

Is this a bug with the originated package setting the label wrongly?
Does it make sense to RFE anaconda to run restorecon as part of
post-install scripts?

[Chris Murphy]

Disregard. I think this should be on the selinux@ list instead.

Chris Murphy