There are reports in fedora-test about the 2.X policy slowing down
udev. (Appears that folks are comparing booting with selinxux=1 with
I have to admit that udev is running slower (targeted/enforcing).
Any validity to this? Known issue? How to track down?
If you would like to help write or update the Fedora SELinux FAQ,
please follow up to this thread on fedora-docs-list(a)redhat.com (reply-to
I've been unable to maintain the FAQ in a proper state for a while now,
and we need the content to be significantly updated for FC5.
Changes made now can be included in the FC5 testing process.
To fill this role, you need to know what is going on in the Fedora
SELinux project. We can take care of the rest with you, from access to
the content and tools to make the changes.
Thanks - Karsten, lazy FAQ maintainer
Karsten Wade, RHCE * Sr. Tech Writer * http://people.redhat.com/kwade/
gpg fingerprint: 2680 DBFD D968 3141 0115 5F1B D992 0E06 AD0E 0C41
Content Services Fedora Documentation Project