Re: rpm %post script fails returning 127

[Shintaro Fujiwara]

Hi, guys.

Thanks for your advices.

I updated selinux-related policies to 117.
Hope others could fix theirs, too...


2014/1/19 Stephen Glenn <stepglenn(a)gmail.com&gt;

>  I'm running a pretty standard Fedora-20 release.
>  What I did to work through the fixes on this:
>
>  ## Clean up yum to start with.
>    yum --enablerepo='*' clean all
>    yum-complete-transaction --cleanup-only
>
>  ## Set SE to permissive
>    setenforce 0
>
>  ## Find out what needs help
>    yum check
>
>  ## Manually update, remove, fix, etc...  PAIN.
>
>  ## Then to correct any duplicates
>    package-cleanup --dupes
>    package-cleanup -y --cleandupes
>
>  ## Get the system updates
>    yum -y --skip-broken distro-sync
>
>  ## Set SE back to enforcing
>    setenforce 1
>    yum check
>    getenforce
>
>  ... I hope this help others...
>
>
>
>  On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 11:56 AM, Dominick Grift <dominick.grift(a)gmail.com
>  > wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 2014-01-18 at 16:13 +0900, Shintaro Fujiwara wrote:
> > > HI, during the process of #rpm -ivh my_program, I had an error saying
> > > as follows.
> > >
> >
> > Yes this was a major mess-up that affected many many fedora users. Some
> > of which got their system broken beyond repair (maybe because they lack
> > knowledge to repair it , i dont know)
> >
> > I do not understand how this could have happened. Does this go to
> > Fedora-testing repository first? Does it not need karma first?
> >
> > How could a change with such great impact make it into Fedora 20 in the
> > first place. This is not rawhide.
> >
> > Anyways yes bad publicity for SELinux but then again, this is Fedora and
> > we (should) know that this can happen...
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > selinux mailing list
> > selinux(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/selinux
>
>
>  

-- 
http://intrajp.no-ip.com/ Home Page