Hi, guys.

Thanks for your advices.

I updated selinux-related policies to 117.
Hope others could fix theirs, too...


2014/1/19 Stephen Glenn <stepglenn@gmail.com>
I'm running a pretty standard Fedora-20 release.
What I did to work through the fixes on this:

## Clean up yum to start with.
  yum --enablerepo='*' clean all
  yum-complete-transaction --cleanup-only

## Set SE to permissive
  setenforce 0

## Find out what needs help
  yum check

## Manually update, remove, fix, etc...  PAIN.

## Then to correct any duplicates
  package-cleanup --dupes
  package-cleanup -y --cleandupes

## Get the system updates
  yum -y --skip-broken distro-sync

## Set SE back to enforcing
  setenforce 1
  yum check
  getenforce

... I hope this help others...



On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 11:56 AM, Dominick Grift <dominick.grift@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, 2014-01-18 at 16:13 +0900, Shintaro Fujiwara wrote:
> HI, during the process of #rpm -ivh my_program, I had an error saying
> as follows.
>

Yes this was a major mess-up that affected many many fedora users. Some
of which got their system broken beyond repair (maybe because they lack
knowledge to repair it , i dont know)

I do not understand how this could have happened. Does this go to
Fedora-testing repository first? Does it not need karma first?

How could a change with such great impact make it into Fedora 20 in the
first place. This is not rawhide.

Anyways yes bad publicity for SELinux but then again, this is Fedora and
we (should) know that this can happen...



--
selinux mailing list
selinux@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/selinux




--
http://intrajp.no-ip.com/ Home Page