-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Clarkson, Mike R (US SSA) wrote:
I just downloaded the policy source from redhat (serefpolicy-2.4.6)
and
attempted to build a strict-mls loadable module policy and got the
following compile error:
Compiling mls base module
/usr/bin/checkmodule -M base.conf -o tmp/base.mod
/usr/bin/checkmodule: loading policy configuration from base.conf
policy/modules/kernel/domain.te:174:ERROR 'unknown type ipsec_spd_t' at
token ';' on line 10298:
allow domain ipsec_spd_t:association polmatch;
#line 174
/usr/bin/checkmodule: error(s) encountered while parsing configuration
make: *** [tmp/base.mod] Error 1
Here is the offending portion of domain.te:
ifdef(`enable_mls',`
tunable_policy(`allow_netlabel',`
kernel_raw_recvfrom_unlabeled(domain)
kernel_tcp_recvfrom_unlabeled(domain)
kernel_udp_recvfrom_unlabeled(domain)
')
tunable_policy(`allow_ipsec_label',`
ipsec_labeled(domain)
')
')
Since domain is a base module and ipsec is a loadable module, doesn't
the call to the ipsec_labeled interface need to be wrapped in an
optional_policy statement? Since nesting conditional statements aren't
supported, I had to comment out the tunable_policy statement to get this
to compile:
#tunable_policy(`allow_ipsec_label',`
optional_policy(`
ipsec_labeled(domain)
')
#')
What's the right fix for this?
--
fedora-selinux-list mailing list
fedora-selinux-list(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-selinux-list
You should move the option_policy lines outside of the tunable_policy,
then it should work.
Also on modules-mls.conf has ipsec as a base module. While targeted has
it as a module.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora -
http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFHVCf+rlYvE4MpobMRAsTCAJwIrOejaMnf5SSQ2CZCsXTPNnAuBQCfa/eP
tD0X+wuPOKgUEsSC7wF3wvw=
=sZM6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----