CVE-2011-0997: How strictly confined is dhcpc_t?

[Christoph A.]

Hi,

in the light of the security vulnerability in the ISC DHCP client
[1][2][3], the obvious question for a fedora/rh/centos user is:
Does SELinux prevent dhclient from accessing my $HOME (user_home_dir_t)
and /media (mnt_t)?
How strictly confined is dhcpc_t?

dhclient runs in the dhcpc_t domain:
system_u:system_r:dhcpc_t:s0    root     /sbin/dhclient

Should it be the case that SELinux protects fc13+ user, it would also be
interesting if this was also the case in fc11 and fc12, even though they
are not supported any more.

If dhcpc_t has access to data in $HOME (directly or via a domain
transition) would it be possible to prevent this access without
impacting the functionality of dhclient to reduce the impact for similar
vulnerabilities in the future?

kind regards,
Christoph A.

[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=694005
[2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2011-0997
[3] https://www.isc.org/software/dhcp/advisories/cve-2011-0997

[yersinia]

On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 1:04 PM, Christoph A. <casmls(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote:
>  Hi,
>
>  in the light of the security vulnerability in the ISC DHCP client
>  [1][2][3], the obvious question for a fedora/rh/centos user is:
>  Does SELinux prevent dhclient from accessing my $HOME (user_home_dir_t)
>  and /media (mnt_t)?
>  How strictly confined is dhcpc_t? 
In my knowledge of selinux  nobody in the selinux
world can access
home directory by default. And this also true for dhcpc. I have not
found, also on fc12, rilevant permission given
to dhcpc_t on user_home_dir_t and /mnt_t : the only found are for or
reading the fs attribute and similar read permission.

Best Regards

[Daniel J Walsh]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 04/07/2011 08:33 AM, yersinia wrote:
>  On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 1:04 PM, Christoph A. <casmls(a)gmail.com&gt;
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > in the light of the security vulnerability in the ISC DHCP client
> > [1][2][3], the obvious question for a fedora/rh/centos user is:
> > Does SELinux prevent dhclient from accessing my $HOME (user_home_dir_t)
> > and /media (mnt_t)?
> > How strictly confined is dhcpc_t?
>  In my knowledge of selinux  nobody in the selinux world can access
>  home directory by default. And this also true for dhcpc. I have not
>  found, also on fc12, rilevant permission given
>  to dhcpc_t on user_home_dir_t and /mnt_t : the only found are for or
>  reading the fs attribute and similar read permission.
>  
>  Best Regards
>  --
>  selinux mailing list
>  selinux(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>  https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/selinux 

You can check the access using sesesearch

On F15 I see

sesearch -A -s dhcpc_t -t user_home_type
Found 2 semantic av rules:
   allow daemon user_tmp_t : file { getattr append } ;
   allow daemon user_home_t : file { getattr append } ;

Meaning that SELinux would allow dhcpc_t to append to a file in the
homedir IFF it was passed as an open file descriptor.

That would be the only allowed access.
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAk2dvUMACgkQrlYvE4MpobMBHwCgknKWOHjyxtNNL3NBIU8jPBY9
> NfoAnipIeUxwsQpRrGEFxe4W3gTls0sC
> =1+on
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[yersinia]

On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 3:33 PM, Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote:
>  -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>  Hash: SHA1
>
>  On 04/07/2011 08:33 AM, yersinia wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 1:04 PM, Christoph A. <casmls(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> in the light of the security vulnerability in the ISC DHCP client
> >> [1][2][3], the obvious question for a fedora/rh/centos user is:
> >> Does SELinux prevent dhclient from accessing my $HOME (user_home_dir_t)
> >> and /media (mnt_t)?
> >> How strictly confined is dhcpc_t?
> > In my knowledge of selinux  nobody in the selinux world can access
> > home directory by default. And this also true for dhcpc. I have not
> > found, also on fc12, rilevant permission given
> > to dhcpc_t on user_home_dir_t and /mnt_t : the only found are for or
> > reading the fs attribute and similar read permission.
> >
> > Best Regards
> > --
> > selinux mailing list
> > selinux(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/selinux
>
>
>  You can check the access using sesesearch
>
>  On F15 I see
>
>  sesearch -A -s dhcpc_t -t user_home_type
>  Found 2 semantic av rules:
>    allow daemon user_tmp_t : file { getattr append } ;
>    allow daemon user_home_t : file { getattr append } ;
>
>  Meaning that SELinux would allow dhcpc_t to append to a file in the
>  homedir IFF it was passed as an open file descriptor.
>
>  That would be the only allowed access. 
sesearch -A -s dhcpc_t -t user_home_t
Found 2 semantic av rules:
   allow daemon user_home_t : file { getattr append } ;
   allow dhcpc_t file_type : filesystem getattr ;

The second rule is for fs_getattr_all_fs(dhcpd_t) in dhcp.te in the
selinux policy. However,
it is very common rule in the selinux policy.

Regards
> >  -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> >  Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
> >  Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
> >
> >  iEYEARECAAYFAk2dvUMACgkQrlYvE4MpobMBHwCgknKWOHjyxtNNL3NBIU8jPBY9
> >  NfoAnipIeUxwsQpRrGEFxe4W3gTls0sC
> >  =1+on
> >  -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- 
>  --
>  selinux mailing list
>  selinux(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>  https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/selinux
>

[Dominick Grift]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 04/07/2011 01:04 PM, Christoph A. wrote:
>  Hi,
>  
>  in the light of the security vulnerability in the ISC DHCP client
>  [1][2][3], the obvious question for a fedora/rh/centos user is:
>  Does SELinux prevent dhclient from accessing my $HOME (user_home_dir_t)
>  and /media (mnt_t)?
>  How strictly confined is dhcpc_t?
>  
>  dhclient runs in the dhcpc_t domain:
>  system_u:system_r:dhcpc_t:s0    root     /sbin/dhclient
>  
>  Should it be the case that SELinux protects fc13+ user, it would also be
>  interesting if this was also the case in fc11 and fc12, even though they
>  are not supported any more. 
The default configuration of SELinux in Fedora only provides limited
protection for users.

>  
>  If dhcpc_t has access to data in $HOME (directly or via a domain
>  transition) would it be possible to prevent this access without
>  impacting the functionality of dhclient to reduce the impact for similar
>  vulnerabilities in the future? 
As for dhcpc_t being able to append to inherited user_home_t and
user_tmp_t files i would guess it is possible to block this access.

Not sure if it would be useful to block it though because dhcpc_t is
only able to append to generic user home and tmp content files and only
if the already open file is passed to it.

It must be noted that SELinux is a framework. The actual rules are just
configuration data. You can make SELinux allow and block whatever you like.

Compare it to netfilter. It is a framework that lets you control network
access. The actual rules you define with for example the iptables
command is just configuration data.

By default when you install Fedora, port 22 is accessible from the
network. That is not netfilters' decision. It is configured that way by
Fedora. Netfilter framework just enabled you to do it.

>  kind regards,
>  Christoph A.
>  
>  [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=694005
>  [2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2011-0997
>  [3] https://www.isc.org/software/dhcp/advisories/cve-2011-0997
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  --
>  selinux mailing list
>  selinux(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>  https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/selinux 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAk2dwuMACgkQMlxVo39jgT9IKACeKYWn9r68sGIAyI6rLDnc6ygh
> UVwAnj62cIdKvsjYVS1d1MyxN/noq4zt
> =wzVF
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----