I understand, thanks.
2014-03-15 19:04 GMT+09:00 Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh(a)redhat.com>:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
semodule -i mypolicy.pp
is equivalent to
semodule -u --force mypolicy.pp
On 03/14/2014 10:07 PM, Shintaro Fujiwara wrote:
> Hi, I was updating a policy because I had to add some permissions.
>
> So, I added number in .te file and successfully upgraded mypolicy.
>
> semodule -u mypolicy.pp
>
> 5 minutes later, I found another permission should have been added to
> mypolicy.pp so I added it and .te number remains the same.
>
> Yes, I should have added permissions at one time and make no haste.
>
> But, isn't it convenient to add --force option to semodule ? Now, if the
> number is the same, I get this error.
>
> [root@localhost xx]# semodule -u mypolicy.pp
> libsemanage.get_direct_upgrade_filename: Previous module mypolicy is same
> or newer. (No such file or directory).
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -- 日本にヘヴィメタル・ハードロックを根付かせるページ
http://heavymetalhardrock.no-ip.info/
> <
http://www.heavymetalhardrock.tk/>
>
> 世界中でセキュアOSのSELinuxを使いやすくするフリーソフト
http://sourceforge.net/projects/segatex/
>
> CMS(PHPとPostgreSQLを使ったフリーソフト)
http://sourceforge.net/projects/webon/
>
>
> -- selinux mailing list selinux(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/selinux
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird -
http://www.enigmail.net/
iEYEARECAAYFAlMkJZsACgkQrlYvE4MpobNNswCdEduTFcji/0kftHtI0ccjNmhB
5jgAoIn1p6MB6o70t+M2NXS9HyuS8Fa2
=2HR1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----