Yum SELINUX Updates.

[Tomas Larsson]

I have seen that there have been several updates of selinux policy.
Do I need to do anything to make it valid, like reboot, relabel or something
similar.

Another "stupid" question, all posts from the list originates from
fedora-selinux-list-bounces(a)redhat.com, I would assume that it means that
the mails are bouncing in my mailbox, but I am not aware that should be the
case, and my isp is telling me that everything is working OK.

With best regards

Tomas Larsson
Sweden

Verus Amicus Est Tamquam Alter Idem

[Daniel J Walsh]

Tomas Larsson wrote:

> I have seen that there have been several updates of selinux policy.
> Do I need to do anything to make it valid, like reboot, relabel or something
> similar.
>   
>  
Should happen automatically.  No relabel, reboot required.

> Another "stupid" question, all posts from the list
> originates from
> fedora-selinux-list-bounces(a)redhat.com, I would assume that it means that
> the mails are bouncing in my mailbox, but I am not aware that should be the
> case, and my isp is telling me that everything is working OK.
>
>   
>  
I thought this would mean you were not subscribed to the list.  But 
since you got this one through not sure what it means.

> With best regards
>
> Tomas Larsson
> Sweden
>
> Verus Amicus Est Tamquam Alter Idem
>
>
>
> --
> fedora-selinux-list mailing list
> fedora-selinux-list(a)redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-selinux-list
>   
>  

--

bounce email address (was Yum SELINUX Updates.)

[Andy Green]

Daniel J Walsh wrote:

> > Another "stupid" question, all posts from the list
> originates from
> > fedora-selinux-list-bounces(a)redhat.com, I would assume that it means that
> > the mails are bouncing in my mailbox, but I am not aware that should
> > be the
> > case, and my isp is telling me that everything is working OK. 
>  I thought this would mean you were not subscribed to the list.  But
>  since you got this one through not sure what it means. 
It's just a way all the Redhat lists detect and deal with nonfunctional
email MTA at the subscribers.  After enough bounces are collected by
that return email address your subscription is put on hold.  This is to
stop monster mailqueues having to be dealt with by Redhat constantly
retrying dead addresses for every mail, etc.

All Redhat mails come from a similar address all the time, it doesn't
reflect any problems.

-Andy

[Tomas Larsson]

>  -----Original Message-----
>  From: Daniel J Walsh [mailto:[e-mail]] 
>  Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2005 11:04 PM
>  To: Tomas Larsson
>  Cc: fedora-selinux-list(a)redhat.com
>  Subject: Re: Yum SELINUX Updates.
>  
>  
>  Tomas Larsson wrote:
>  
>  >I have seen that there have been several updates of selinux 
>  policy. Do 
>  >I need to do anything to make it valid, like reboot, relabel or 
>  >something similar.
>  >  
>  >
>  Should happen automatically.  No relabel, reboot required. 
OK, anywhere where I can find what is updated, since I still have problem
with webalizer is denyed to access vsftpd.log as a crond-jobb.

>  
>  >Another "stupid" question, all posts from the list originates from 
>  >fedora-selinux-list-bounces(a)redhat.com, I would assume that it means 
>  >that the mails are bouncing in my mailbox, but I am not aware that 
>  >should be the case, and my isp is telling me that everything 
>  is working 
>  >OK.
>  >
>  >  
>  >
>  I thought this would mean you were not subscribed to the list.  But 
>  since you got this one through not sure what it means.
>  
>  >With best regards
>  >
>  >Tomas Larsson
>  >Sweden
>  >
>  >Verus Amicus Est Tamquam Alter Idem
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >--
>  >fedora-selinux-list mailing list fedora-selinux-list(a)redhat.com
>  >https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-selinux-list
>  >  
>  >
>  
>  
>  -- 
>  
>   
 

With best regards

Tomas Larsson
Sweden

Verus Amicus Est Tamquam Alter Idem

[Daniel J Walsh]

Tomas Larsson wrote:

> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Daniel J Walsh [mailto:[e-mail]] 
> >Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2005 11:04 PM
> >To: Tomas Larsson
> >Cc: fedora-selinux-list(a)redhat.com
> >Subject: Re: Yum SELINUX Updates.
> >
> >
> >Tomas Larsson wrote:
> >
> >    
> >
> >>I have seen that there have been several updates of selinux 
> >>      
> >>
> >policy. Do 
> >    
> >
> >>I need to do anything to make it valid, like reboot, relabel or 
> >>something similar.
> >> 
> >>
> >>      
> >>
> >Should happen automatically.  No relabel, reboot required.
> >    
> >
>
> OK, anywhere where I can find what is updated, since I still have problem
> with webalizer is denyed to access vsftpd.log as a crond-jobb.
>
>   
>
> >>Another "stupid" question, all posts from the list originates from 
> >>fedora-selinux-list-bounces(a)redhat.com, I would assume that it means 
> >>that the mails are bouncing in my mailbox, but I am not aware that 
> >>should be the case, and my isp is telling me that everything 
> >>      
> >>
> >is working 
> >    
> >
> >>OK.
> >>
> >> 
> >>
> >>      
> >>
> >I thought this would mean you were not subscribed to the list.  But 
> >since you got this one through not sure what it means.
> >    
> > 
Basically the fix should allow webalizer policy to read xferlog_t.  What 
AVC messages are you seeing when this fails?

Dan

> >    
> >
> >>With best regards
> >>
> >>Tomas Larsson
> >>Sweden
> >>
> >>Verus Amicus Est Tamquam Alter Idem
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>--
> >>fedora-selinux-list mailing list fedora-selinux-list(a)redhat.com
> >>https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-selinux-list
> >> 
> >>
> >>      
> >>
> >-- 
> >
> >
> >    
> >
>
>  
>
> With best regards
>
> Tomas Larsson
> Sweden
>
> Verus Amicus Est Tamquam Alter Idem
>
>
>   
>  

--

On Tue, 27 Sep 2005 22:15:27 +0200, Tomas Larsson said:

>  Another "stupid" question, all posts from the list
> originates from
>  fedora-selinux-list-bounces(a)redhat.com, I would assume that it means that
>  the mails are bouncing in my mailbox 
No, what that *really* is "*if* the mail *does* bounce in your mailbox, your ISP
should send the bounce to fedora-selinux-list-bounces(a)redhat.com".  That address
then (in this case) gets fed into software that figures out that your mailbox is
dead and you should be unsubscribed...