thanks for your reply, see responses below:
On September 18, 2012 22:31:02 Dominick Grift wrote:
On Tue, 2012-09-18 at 13:32 -0600, Dmitry Makovey wrote:
> What I really wander about is - above I've opened up quite a few things
> that are very specific to this mode of operation, however I can't believe
> I'm in a situation nobody else have been before and there are no
> booleans/tunables for most of things outlined above. So is there a way to
> make above utilize existing hooks or is it "as good as it gets"?
This actually looks pretty good in this case and well suited for a
boolean in the postgresql policy in my opinion.
good to know it's not just me who thinks that way :)
Currently this is indeed not supported by the policy it seems.
Why not file a bugzilla report as a feature request?
Web Systems Administrator
Confidence is what you have before you understand the problem
When in trouble when in doubt run in circles scream and shout
This communication is intended for the use of the recipient to whom it
is addressed, and may contain confidential, personal, and or privileged
information. Please contact us immediately if you are not the intended
recipient of this communication, and do not copy, distribute, or take
action relying on it. Any communications received in error, or
subsequent reply, should be deleted or destroyed.