full_user_role macro not working as expected

[Jeremy Utley]

Greetings everyone!

I'm trying to set up a demonstration of SELinux functionality for a
few people, and have been hitting my head against a brick wall on it
for 2 days, was hoping that maybe you guys could give me some
advice...Background:

System:
Fedora Core 3, updated to latest packages via "yum update"
Strict policy, version 1.19.10-2, and the strict policy sources installed.

The Goal:
To demonstrate locking down access to a file to only a certain role,
privileged_r.  User account should have to access that role via the
newrole command.

The current problem:
According to the policy writing docs, a role should be created via the
full_user_role() macro.  So, in domains/misc/custom_policy.te, I
placed the following line (along with other custom rules that have
already been compiled successfully and work):

full_user_role(privileged)

The docs also say that new user roles should be added to the
in_user_role macro within macros/user_macros.te, so I did that as
well, making that macro look like this:

undefine(`in_user_role')
define(`in_user_role', `
role user_r types $1;
role staff_r types $1;
role privileged_r type $1;
')


Now, when trying to compile the policy after that, I get the following error:

/usr/bin/checkpolicy:  loading policy configuration from policy.conf
domains/misc/custom_policy.te:13:ERROR 'unknown type
privileged_userhelper_t' at token ';' on line 115000:
#line 13
allow privileged_mozilla_t privileged_userhelper_t:process transition;
/usr/bin/checkpolicy:  error(s) encountered while parsing configuration
make: *** [/etc/selinux/strict/policy/policy.18] Error 1


I've been banging my head against the wall on this one for a day and a
half - have searched the web, read numerous docs on creating policy,
looked at how the full_user_role macro is used elsewhere in the
policy, and I simply can't figure out what I'm doing wrong.

Anyone have any ideas?

Jeremy

[Stephen Smalley]

On Thu, 2005-06-09 at 13:28 -0700, Jeremy Utley wrote:
>  The current problem:
>  According to the policy writing docs, a role should be created via the
>  full_user_role() macro.  So, in domains/misc/custom_policy.te, I
>  placed the following line (along with other custom rules that have
>  already been compiled successfully and work):
>  
>  full_user_role(privileged) 
In order to support role changes via newrole, you need some further
rules.  These are defined in the role_tty_type_change() macro defined in
domains/user.te, which means that you presently have to add rules to
domains/user.te; that macro definition should likely be moved to
base_user_macros.te or user_macros.te so that it can be used elsewhere.

If you want the role to be able to use userhelper, sudo, or su, you also
need to include reach_sysadm(privileged); that macro is also presently
defined in domains/user.te and should likely be moved to user_macros.te
or base_user_macros.te.

>  Now, when trying to compile the policy after that, I get the
> following error:
>  
>  /usr/bin/checkpolicy:  loading policy configuration from policy.conf
>  domains/misc/custom_policy.te:13:ERROR 'unknown type
>  privileged_userhelper_t' at token ';' on line 115000:
>  #line 13
>  allow privileged_mozilla_t privileged_userhelper_t:process transition;
>  /usr/bin/checkpolicy:  error(s) encountered while parsing configuration
>  make: *** [/etc/selinux/strict/policy/policy.18] Error 1 
That's a bug in mozilla_macros.te, already removed in the
FC4/development strict policy.  Remove the userhelper transition from
it:

--- macros/program/mozilla_macros.te.orig	2005-06-10 08:37:54.636627280 -0400
+++ macros/program/mozilla_macros.te	2005-06-10 08:38:11.886004976 -0400
@@ -116,9 +116,6 @@
 dontaudit $1_mozilla_t file_type:dir getattr;
 allow $1_mozilla_t self:sem create_sem_perms;
 
-ifdef(`userhelper.te', `
-domain_auto_trans($1_mozilla_t, userhelper_exec_t, $1_userhelper_t)
-')
 dontaudit $1_mozilla_t selinux_config_t:dir search;
 
 #


-- 
Stephen Smalley
National Security Agency