/u?dev/microcode ?

[Tom London]

A previous posting indicated that /u?dev/microcode should be labeled as
system_u:object_r:cpu_device_t.

Is this still needed? Added to file_contexts/types.fc?

tom

[Russell Coker]

On Fri, 25 Jun 2004 02:49, Tom London  wrote:
> A previous posting indicated that /u?dev/microcode should be labeled as
> system_u:object_r:cpu_device_t.
>
> Is this still needed? Added to file_contexts/types.fc?

Yes it's still needed.  If it's not yet in the fedora policy then it soon will 
be.

[Stephen Smalley]

On Fri, 2004-06-25 at 00:11, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Jun 2004 02:49, Tom London  wrote:
> > A previous posting indicated that /u?dev/microcode should be labeled as
> > system_u:object_r:cpu_device_t.
> >
> > Is this still needed? Added to file_contexts/types.fc?
>
> Yes it's still needed.  If it's not yet in the fedora policy then it soon will 
> be.

Current file_contexts/types.fc already has the following entry:
/u?dev/cpu/.*           -c      system_u:object_r:cpu_device_t

And ls -Z /dev/cpu/0/microcode does show the right context.

[Stephen Smalley]

On Fri, 2004-06-25 at 08:01, Stephen Smalley wrote:
> Current file_contexts/types.fc already has the following entry:
> /u?dev/cpu/.*           -c      system_u:object_r:cpu_device_t
>
> And ls -Z /dev/cpu/0/microcode does show the right context.

Sorry, I misread the original posting.  There is no entry for a
/udev/microcode in types.fc.