kernel-2.6.6-1.427 has made it to the 'released updates' tree.
My other system that is running this version is also running the new selinux-policy packages, and I previously needed to add 'selinux=1' to the boot params.
Before I test it out on my 'real machine', anyone know if .427 will work with the old policy packages, file tree (/etc/security/selinux vs. /etc/selinux) and config file (/etc/sysconfig/selinux vs. /etc/selinux/config)? Do I still need the 'selinux=1' boot param?
thanks tom
OK. I tested the waters myself.
1. 'selinux=1' is no longer needed as bootparam. 2. kernel-2.6.6-1.427 works just fine with 'old' policy packages. 3. works fine with 'old' /etc/sysconfig/selinux.
I installed and test booted it: came up in enforcing mode with no problems.
tom
Tom London wrote:
kernel-2.6.6-1.427 has made it to the 'released updates' tree.
My other system that is running this version is also running the new selinux-policy packages, and I previously needed to add 'selinux=1' to the boot params.
Before I test it out on my 'real machine', anyone know if .427 will work with the old policy packages, file tree (/etc/security/selinux vs. /etc/selinux) and config file (/etc/sysconfig/selinux vs. /etc/selinux/config)? Do I still need the 'selinux=1' boot param?
thanks tom
selinux@lists.fedoraproject.org