2:32 p.m.
Hi,
I just noticed that I have over 100 processes running in the
sandbox_web_client_t domain, although I closed all my sandbox windows.
ps auxZ|grep sandbox_web_client_t|grep -c /usr/libexec/gvfsd
52
ps auxZ|grep sandbox_web_client_t|grep -c '/bin/dbus-daemon --fork
--print-pid 5 --print-address 7 --session'
51
Shouldn't they be killed after I closed all sandbox windows?
Kind regards,
Christoph
3:38 p.m.
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 12:32 PM, Christoph A. <casmls(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
I just noticed that I have over 100 processes running in the
sandbox_web_client_t domain, although I closed all my sandbox windows.
ps auxZ|grep sandbox_web_client_t|grep -c /usr/libexec/gvfsd
52
ps auxZ|grep sandbox_web_client_t|grep -c '/bin/dbus-daemon --fork
--print-pid 5 --print-address 7 --session'
51
Shouldn't they be killed after I closed all sandbox windows?
Kind regards,
Christoph
I see this too.
Could pulseaudio not be shutting down gracefully? Just a guess....
tom
--
Tom London
3:48 p.m.
On Thu, 2010-08-19 at 13:38 -0700, Tom London wrote:
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 12:32 PM, Christoph A.
<casmls(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just noticed that I have over 100 processes running in the
> sandbox_web_client_t domain, although I closed all my sandbox windows.
>
> ps auxZ|grep sandbox_web_client_t|grep -c /usr/libexec/gvfsd
> 52
>
> ps auxZ|grep sandbox_web_client_t|grep -c '/bin/dbus-daemon --fork
> --print-pid 5 --print-address 7 --session'
> 51
>
> Shouldn't they be killed after I closed all sandbox windows?
>
> Kind regards,
> Christoph
>
>
I see this too.
Could pulseaudio not be shutting down gracefully? Just a guess....
tom
I don't believe this has anything to do with the sandbox. I am getting
similar problems at home on F13 when I use xming to do x forwarding
between my Windows and Linux machines. I was using it on virt-manager on
that machine and was still having the problems.
Dave
6:23 a.m.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 08/19/2010 04:48 PM, David P. Quigley wrote:
On Thu, 2010-08-19 at 13:38 -0700, Tom London wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 12:32 PM, Christoph A. <casmls(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I just noticed that I have over 100 processes running in the
>> sandbox_web_client_t domain, although I closed all my sandbox windows.
>>
>> ps auxZ|grep sandbox_web_client_t|grep -c /usr/libexec/gvfsd
>> 52
>>
>> ps auxZ|grep sandbox_web_client_t|grep -c '/bin/dbus-daemon --fork
>> --print-pid 5 --print-address 7 --session'
>> 51
>>
>> Shouldn't they be killed after I closed all sandbox windows?
>>
>> Kind regards,
>> Christoph
>>
>>
> I see this too.
>
> Could pulseaudio not be shutting down gracefully? Just a guess....
>
> tom
I don't believe this has anything to do with the sandbox. I am getting
similar problems at home on F13 when I use xming to do x forwarding
between my Windows and Linux machines. I was using it on virt-manager on
that machine and was still having the problems.
Dave
--
selinux mailing list
selinux(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/selinux
I wish there was a way to setup a different cgroup for each sandbox.
then we could do a killall on the cgroup.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAkxvtxoACgkQrlYvE4MpobO+IwCgmDlihRxt5FBNlBmnC+xtgrcO
QkIAn3866EfNLT3xyw2InIgtSVygnz52
=XZT3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
9:04 a.m.
On 08/21/2010 01:23 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
On 08/19/2010 04:48 PM, David P. Quigley wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-08-19 at 13:38 -0700, Tom London wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 12:32 PM, Christoph A. <casmls(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I just noticed that I have over 100 processes running in the
>>> sandbox_web_client_t domain, although I closed all my sandbox windows.
>>>
>>> ps auxZ|grep sandbox_web_client_t|grep -c /usr/libexec/gvfsd
>>> 52
>>>
>>> ps auxZ|grep sandbox_web_client_t|grep -c '/bin/dbus-daemon --fork
>>> --print-pid 5 --print-address 7 --session'
>>> 51
>>>
>>> Shouldn't they be killed after I closed all sandbox windows?
>>>
>>> Kind regards,
>>> Christoph
>>>
>>>
>> I see this too.
>>
>> Could pulseaudio not be shutting down gracefully? Just a guess....
>>
>> tom
> I don't believe this has anything to do with the sandbox. I am getting
> similar problems at home on F13 when I use xming to do x forwarding
> between my Windows and Linux machines. I was using it on virt-manager on
> that machine and was still having the problems.
> Dave
> --
> selinux mailing list
> selinux(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/selinux
I wish there was a way to setup a different cgroup for each sandbox.
then we could do a killall on the cgroup.
I am not sure but could cgexec (man cgexec) help here? That is how
initrc puts services in a defined cgroup.
--
selinux mailing list
selinux(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/selinux
3:40 p.m.
On 08/21/2010 01:23 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
I wish there was a way to setup a different cgroup for each sandbox.
then we could do a killall on the cgroup.
Is it ok if I file the bugreport against policycoreutils-python, or is
this issue not sandbox specific?
kind regards,
Christoph
8:36 a.m.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 08/21/2010 04:40 PM, Christoph A. wrote:
On 08/21/2010 01:23 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> I wish there was a way to setup a different cgroup for each sandbox.
> then we could do a killall on the cgroup.
Is it ok if I file the bugreport against policycoreutils-python, or is
this issue not sandbox specific?
kind regards,
Christoph
--
selinux mailing list
selinux(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/selinux
You can file it against
policycoreutils.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAkxyeUEACgkQrlYvE4MpobPA1ACeMjQbtfFy00r/9TigKuWxC33B
6joAoN8yKrcgwaHQUgcK5bBMBB1Giljo
=EFk7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
4:10 p.m.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Christoph A. wrote:
Hi,
I just noticed that I have over 100 processes running in the
sandbox_web_client_t domain, although I closed all my sandbox windows.
ps auxZ|grep sandbox_web_client_t|grep -c /usr/libexec/gvfsd
52
ps auxZ|grep sandbox_web_client_t|grep -c '/bin/dbus-daemon --fork
--print-pid 5 --print-address 7 --session'
51
Shouldn't they be killed after I closed all sandbox windows?
Same problem with these processes:
/usr/bin/pulseaudio --start --log-target=syslog
/usr/libexec/pulse/gconf-helper
(running in sandbox_web_client_t)
I have lots of them..
Christoph
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iEYEAREKAAYFAk36cTAACgkQrq+riTAIEg0d8ACbBb/hOqjB9oKHwGOZQkhAz5t5
b6QAoM72ZrKrB+452n4v9LqLkDg3e+tb
=HzUW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
8:02 a.m.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 06/16/2011 05:10 PM, Christoph A. wrote:
Christoph A. wrote:
> Hi,
> I just noticed that I have over 100 processes running in the
> sandbox_web_client_t domain, although I closed all my sandbox windows.
> ps auxZ|grep sandbox_web_client_t|grep -c /usr/libexec/gvfsd
> 52
> ps auxZ|grep sandbox_web_client_t|grep -c '/bin/dbus-daemon --fork
> --print-pid 5 --print-address 7 --session'
> 51
> Shouldn't they be killed after I closed all sandbox windows?
Same problem with these processes:
/usr/bin/pulseaudio --start --log-target=syslog
/usr/libexec/pulse/gconf-helper
(running in sandbox_web_client_t)
I have lots of them..
Christoph
- --
selinux mailing list
selinux(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/selinux
Please open a bug with policycoreutils including version of packages.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAk37UFoACgkQrlYvE4MpobO+DACgxMHArW4Up3cawLWnrrp4lhWP
5hYAn2JQBOciOMvG84myGJKwc2L9id7s
=d8eR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
8:19 a.m.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Daniel J Walsh wrote:
Please open a bug with policycoreutils including version of packages.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=714152
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iEYEAREKAAYFAk37VHMACgkQrq+riTAIEg0D5ACgza63WsBGscOIUUxquJlzytsQ
UScAoN+hRiHmIk1DnMt/NmrgcM8sLZEQ
=4bb8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
5:48 a.m.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Christoph A. wrote:
Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> Please open a bug with policycoreutils including version of packages.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=714152
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/policycoreutils-2.0.85-30.1.fc14
Status: pending
Requested: testing
Pushed: False
Date Submitted: 2011-06-17 17:21:15
Seams to take a while. I thought updates are pushed to testing once a day..
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iEYEAREKAAYFAk3/JYwACgkQrq+riTAIEg2c6wCgji7HqlNvRwS1MUYaG0juN6F/
IfEAoJ/lHUan7VLl7HZHC50xc3dJ1fxY
=QtJs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
5:55 a.m.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 06/20/2011 06:48 AM, Christoph A. wrote:
Christoph A. wrote:
> Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>> Please open a bug with policycoreutils including version of packages.
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=714152
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/policycoreutils-2.0.85-30.1.fc14
Status: pending
Requested: testing
Pushed: False
Date Submitted: 2011-06-17 17:21:15
Seams to take a while. I thought updates are pushed to testing once a day..
- --
selinux mailing list
selinux(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/selinux
No a Human has to push it. So It is somewhat arbitrary.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAk3/Jx4ACgkQrlYvE4MpobMeKwCfTfEvRlEvLpEtxTiQWhmYdxQE
cEQAnidYhZxHGlib/2jihJg/uTQ1SiDX
=RI3w
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
4692
days inactive
4997
days old
selinux@lists.fedoraproject.org
11 comments
5 participants
participants (5)
-
Christoph A. -
Daniel J Walsh -
David P. Quigley -
Dominick Grift -
Tom London