March 2015 - server - Fedora mailing-lists

Trimming down the package set
by Stephen Gallagher 03 Apr '15

03 Apr '15

So, at DevConf over the weekend, I had a conversation with several people around the package set that we should include on the Fedora Server install media in Fedora 22. When we put together the install media for Fedora 21, we basically took the old Fedora 20 DVD install and stripped out some of the things we didn't feel were necessary for the Server. However, I suspect that we may have missed numerous things that are not *strictly* important for Server. In particular, the Fedora Server DVD includes the package groups for many of the Fedora development tools (particularly those useful for developing Fedora *itself*, such as the @fedora-packager group. I don't currently have statistics on how much space this would save on the installation DVD (since I would pretty much have to build one without these packages to verify it), but I can get an approximate idea of the difference by installing the minimal set of Server packages on one VM and a set that includes the devel packages on another. The result I see is: == Standard Server Install == * 614 packages * 1,097 MB on the installed system == Server Install Plus Development Tools == * 716 packages * 1496 MB on the installed system. Even if we assume a (very) generous assumption that the RPM compression reduces the size difference by 50%, we still see a probable savings of 200 MB on the install DVD. So, my questions to the Server SIG: 1) Is this savings in the DVD ISO download size sufficiently significant to continue this conversation? 2) Does anyone see any value in keeping this material *on the DVD*? Obviously, all of these packages will remain available to the network install or post-installation environments. For those who are interested in minutiae, I am attaching the current fedora-install-server.ks file that is used to generate the DVD. If you see anything else there that might be worth including in this discussion, I'm all ears.

7 16

Password policy changes
by Adam Williamson 02 Apr '15

02 Apr '15

Hey, folks. I'm writing with my Server SIG member hat on, here. We've been discussing password policy changes at our meeting today. So the Great Password Policy Bunfight of 2015 was resolved by anaconda creating a mechanism for products/spins to set their own password policy: https://github.com/rhinstaller/anaconda/commit/8f24eeaedd7691b6ebe119592e5b… I'm slightly worried, however, about the possibility that everyone goes out and picks a more lenient policy more or less at random and we wind up with different policies on every Fedora medium. That seems like it'd be needlessly confusing to users and difficult to document. I'm wondering if those products/spins intending to set a policy weaker than the default could all agree on the same one, so there'd only be at most two policies to care about (and if all products/spins overrode the upstream default, there'd only be one). The obvious choice would be the pre-F22 policy, which I believe should be: --nostrict --minlen=6 --minquality=50 --nochanges --emptyok (though it's not *entirely* clear from the code - I think it used pwquality upstream defaults - so I may be a bit off). What's the general feeling here? Have other SIGs discussed this yet? Come to any decisions? Thanks! -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net

6 5

[Testing Needed] rolekit-0.3.0-1.fc22
by Stephen Gallagher 01 Apr '15

01 Apr '15

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rolekit-0.3.0-1.fc22 Defying even my own expectations, we've released rolekit 0.3.0 today with full multiple-instancing support. I'd really like for this to end up in the Fedora 22 Beta which freezes on Tuesday morning, so if anyone who is willing can please download the Fedora 22 Server TC5 that will be available in a few hours, update to rolekit-0.3.0 and try it out, that would be a big help. Some things to test: == Database Server Role == * Install the first instance from a mostly pristine Server install. * Install additional instance * Install some instances with the default owner, others with a custom one. * Decommission them in random order. * Ensure that they can be reached over TCP/IP sockets == Domain Controller Role == No obvious regressions. This is unlikely, since we didn't touch the Domain Controller role code and made only minor tweaks to the common code.

1 2

Server SIG Weekly Meeting Minutes (2015-03-31)
by Stephen Gallagher 31 Mar '15

31 Mar '15

========================================================= #fedora-meeting-1: Server SIG Weekly Meeting (2015-03-31) ========================================================= Meeting started by sgallagh at 15:01:31 UTC. The full logs are available at http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2015-03-31/fedora-meeting… . Meeting summary --------------- * roll call (sgallagh, 15:01:32) * Agenda (sgallagh, 15:07:02) * Agenda Item: F22 Beta Freeze (sgallagh, 15:07:02) * Agenda Item: Rolekit Testing (sgallagh, 15:07:02) * F22 Beta Freeze (sgallagh, 15:08:05) * TC6 is lacking content from the last stable updates push (sgallagh, 15:14:40) * TC6 does not include the pwpolicy changes yet (sgallagh, 15:14:53) * The addition of dnf-yum was broken on TC6 (sgallagh, 15:15:16) * Rolekit Testing (sgallagh, 15:18:23) * Testing help needed on rolekit, test plan at https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/server/2015-March/001795.html (sgallagh, 15:21:39) * rolekit test examples at https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/server/2015-March/001797.html (sgallagh, 15:22:08) * Open Floor (sgallagh, 15:24:52) * getfedora.org updates (sgallagh, 15:29:15) * highlight DB role (mizmo, 15:29:49) * update cockpit screenshots (mizmo, 15:29:56) * consider rolekit visualization (mizmo, 15:32:25) * solicit new quotes for server page (mizmo, 15:33:23) * quote: andreasn from the Cockpit team to quote on the Domain Controller role, since he had an excellent experience with it (mizmo, 15:35:28) * Open Floor (take two) (sgallagh, 15:39:44) Meeting ended at 15:43:28 UTC. Action Items ------------ Action Items, by person ----------------------- * **UNASSIGNED** * (none) People Present (lines said) --------------------------- * sgallagh (63) * junland (23) * mizmo (19) * zodbot (8) * nirik (4) * simo (4) * Corey84 (1) * adamw (0) * mitr (0) * stefw (0) * danofsatx (0) * tuanta (0) Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4 .. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot

1 0

Server SIG Meeting Agenda (2015-03-31)
by Stephen Gallagher 31 Mar '15

31 Mar '15

Topics: * Beta Freeze in effect * Beta TC6 arriving today * Rolekit testing Other items?

1 0

2015-03-30 @ 1600 UTC ** Fedora 22 Blocker Review
by Mike Ruckman 30 Mar '15

30 Mar '15

# F22 Blocker Review meeting # Date: 2015-03-30 # Time: 1600 UTC # Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net Well, this email is going out a bit late, but I'm sure you all know it's that time of the week again! We've had a few more proposals since our meeting last week. We currently have 5 beta and 2 final proposals to review. If you want to take a look at the proposed or accepted blockers, the full list can be found here: https://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/ Make sure to click through the milestones to see how many we have before the meeting! We'll be evaluating these bugs to see if they violate any of the Release Criteria and warrant the blocking of a release if they're not fixed. Information on the release criteria for F22 can be found on the wiki [0]. For more information about the Blocker and Freeze exception process, check out these links: - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_blocker_bug_process - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_freeze_exception_bug_process And for those of you who are curious how a Blocker Review Meeting works - or how it's supposed to go and you want to run one - check out the SOP on the wiki: - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting See you tomorrow! [0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Release_Criteria -- // Mike -- Fedora QA freenode: roshi http://roshi.fedorapeople.org

1 0

Re: Review Request 150: Define the password policy for the interactive installer
by Stephen Gallagher 25 Mar '15

25 Mar '15

----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviewboard-fedoraserver.rhcloud.com/r/150/ ----------------------------------------------------------- (Updated March 25, 2015, 1:12 p.m.) Review request for Server SIG. Changes ------- Set the reviewer to the Server SIG Repository: fedora-productimg-server Description ------- - Reorganize some of the paths into %globals for easier updating Diffs ----- fedora-productimg-server.spec 2c126d01d9939d50f626ed69717325e7b58fe31f interactive-defaults.ks PRE-CREATION Diff: http://reviewboard-fedoraserver.rhcloud.com/r/150/diff/ Testing ------- Testing has been limited due to anaconda packages not being available for testing. The version currently in F22 hasn't been built with this support and Rawhide crashes on unrelated issues. Full testing will be done on Friday. Thanks, Stephen Gallagher

1 0

Server SIG Weekly Meeting Minutes (2015-03-24)
by Stephen Gallagher 24 Mar '15

24 Mar '15

========================================================= #fedora-meeting-1: Server SIG Weekly Meeting (2015-03-24) ========================================================= Meeting started by sgallagh at 15:00:30 UTC. The full logs are available at http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2015-03-24/fedora-meeting… . Meeting summary --------------- * roll call (sgallagh, 15:00:31) * Agenda (sgallagh, 15:03:18) * Agenda Item: Anaconda Password Policy (sgallagh, 15:03:30) * Anaconda Password Policy (sgallagh, 15:05:48) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1191842#c14 (sgallagh, 15:06:06) * ACTION: adamw to email other products to try to unify the pwpolicy change (sgallagh, 15:16:17) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Kevin/Draft_Passwordpolicy (nirik, 15:21:36) * LINK: http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/bunfight (adamw, 15:38:09) * AGREED: The password policy will be "--nostrict --minlen=6 --minquality=50 --nochanges --emptyok" for root, user and luks (sgallagh, 15:39:12) * ACTION: sgallagh to update fedora-productimg-server with the agreed defaults. (sgallagh, 15:42:08) * Open Floor (sgallagh, 15:42:57) * LINK: http://reviewboard-fedoraserver.rhcloud.com/dashboard/ (sgallagh, 15:44:40) * Help needed in reviewing rolekit database server patches (sgallagh, 15:44:53) * ACTION: adamw and danofsatx to review the database server patches at their convenience (sgallagh, 15:47:27) Meeting ended at 15:49:32 UTC. Action Items ------------ * adamw to email other products to try to unify the pwpolicy change * sgallagh to update fedora-productimg-server with the agreed defaults. * adamw and danofsatx to review the database server patches at their convenience Action Items, by person ----------------------- * adamw * adamw to email other products to try to unify the pwpolicy change * adamw and danofsatx to review the database server patches at their convenience * danofsatx * adamw and danofsatx to review the database server patches at their convenience * sgallagh * sgallagh to update fedora-productimg-server with the agreed defaults. * **UNASSIGNED** * (none) People Present (lines said) --------------------------- * sgallagh (99) * mizmo (47) * adamw (45) * simo (38) * nirik (37) * danofsatx (14) * zodbot (10) * stefw (7) * junland (3) * masta (1) * mitr (0) * tuanta (0) Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4 .. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot

1 0

Regrets not attending today meeting
by Truong Anh Tuan 24 Mar '15

24 Mar '15

Hi there, I got a bad headache then I want to go to bed earlier; so I could not attend today meeting, sorry. I will read the meeting minutes later. Rgds, Tuan

1 0

Agenda for Server SIG Meeting (2015-04-24)
by Stephen Gallagher 24 Mar '15

24 Mar '15

We have one item so far on the agenda for this week: The decision on the Anaconda password-policy. Anything else?

1 0

[Fwd: Test day: Cockpit on Fedora Server]
by Stephen Gallagher 23 Mar '15

23 Mar '15

1 0

Anaconda has a product specific password policies support now
by Jaroslav Reznik 23 Mar '15

23 Mar '15

Hi, as this was hot topic on the lists and it's FESCo blocker, so in case you missed it (as it's very new), it's now possible to create product specific password policies in Anaconda! For details, check out https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1191842#c14 Thanks bcl! Jaroslav

2 1

[Review Requested] Database Server Role
by Stephen Gallagher 20 Mar '15

20 Mar '15

I've put together what I hope are the final set of patches we need for the Database Server Role in Fedora 22 Beta. There are three of them, reviewable at http://reviewboard-fedoraserver.rhcloud.com/dashboard/ The first implements multiple-instance support for databases. It does this by tying all of the instances together with systemd so that they start or stop together. The second makes a minor change to the mandatory options, allowing the consumer to simply skip choosing a name for the database owner. The last implements the decommissioning step. I'd appreciate a review as soon as possible so I can make any needed changes before the Beta Freeze (so really, I only have next week to do so). Thanks in advance. p.s. If anyone is wants to help with the review and is unfamiliar with Review Board, have a look at https://www.reviewboard.org/docs/manual/2.0/users/reviews/reviewing-diffs/ (and don't forget to "Publish" your review, otherwise I'll never see it).

1 0

Call for Agenda for Server SIG weekly meeting (2015-03-17)
by Stephen Gallagher 17 Mar '15

17 Mar '15

Once again, I'm late with the call for agenda. Sorry folks. The only thing I think we had on the agenda this week was a check-in on the testing of Beta TC1 over the last week. Some of the QA folks ran through the tests[1] and it looks like it's in good shape. If there's nothing else for the agenda, we can skip this week. Input welcome. [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_ Results:Fedora_22_Beta_TC1_Server and

1 1

Docker installed by default due to cockpit dependency chain
by Václav Pavlín 16 Mar '15

16 Mar '15

Hi, I am not sure if that was intentional or not but to be sure, I'd like to bring up this dependency "issue": We've tried to install minimal Fedora with KS where in %packages was just @core. This installed fedora-release-server -> cockpit -> cockpit-docker -> docker(-io) I understand why Cockpit is installed by default but I don't think docker should be part of such minimal install.. My proposal would be to change the dependency so that fedora-release-server Requires: cockpit docker-io Requires: cockpit-docker This would mean non-existent Containers page in Cockpit in minimal install which would magically appear when the user installs docker. Thoughts? Thanks, Vašek -- Lead Infrastructure Engineer Developer Experience Brno, Czech Republic

5 7

2015-03-16 @ 1600 UTC ** Fedora Blocker Review
by Mike Ruckman 14 Mar '15

14 Mar '15

# F22 Blocker Review meeting # Date: 2015-03-16 # Time: 1600 UTC # Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net It's coming up to that time of the week again: Blocker Review! Currently we have 5/1 proposed blockers for Beta and Final. Again, we're meeting at 1600 UTC right after the QA meeting. If you have some time this weekend, take a look at the bugs. Or, if you won't be able to make it to the review, go ahead and vote in the comments. The full list can be found here: https://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/ Make sure to click through the milestones to see how many we have before the meeting! We'll be evaluating these bugs to see if they violate any of the Release Criteria and warrant the blocking of a release if they're not fixed. Information on the release criteria for F22 can be found on the wiki [0]. For more information about the Blocker and Freeze exception process, check out these links: - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_blocker_bug_process - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_freeze_exception_bug_process And for those of you who are curious how a Blocker Review Meeting works - or how it's supposed to go and you want to run one - check out the SOP on the wiki: - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting Have a good weekend and see you Monday! [0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Release_Criteria -- // Mike -- Fedora QA freenode: roshi http://roshi.fedorapeople.org

1 0

Draft: Database Server Role Requirements
by Dan Mossor 14 Mar '15

14 Mar '15

Fellow server enthusiasts, John Unland and I have put together a draft DB Server Role Requirements doc [1] based on the Domain Controller Role Requirements doc [2]. We took the information from the mail list threads [3, 4, 5] where it was briefly discussed. We welcome any feedback and input before it gets pushed live. Regards, Dan [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Dmossor/DBRoleReqs [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Domain_controller_role_requirements [3] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/server/2014-December/001671.html [4] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/server/2014-December/001674.html [5] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/server/2014-December/001694.html -- Dan Mossor, RHCSA Systems Engineer at Large Fedora Plasma Product WG | Fedora QA Team | Fedora Server WG Fedora Infrastructure Apprentice FAS: dmossor IRC: danofsatx San Antonio, Texas, USA

4 4

Early Beta Validation for Fedora Server 22
by Stephen Gallagher 11 Mar '15

11 Mar '15

As of today, the first Test Candidate for Fedora Server 22 Beta is available[1]. As discussed in yesterday's Server SIG meeting, we would like to have full coverage of the Beta Criteria[2] by next Tuesday's meeting so we can see what needs to be fixed up before we enter Beta Freeze on March 31st. If you can find the time, please attempt to cover at least a couple of the cases in [2]. [1] http://alt-dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/22_Beta_TC1/Server/ [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_22_Beta_TC1_Server

1 0

Server SIG Weekly Meeting Minutes (2015-03-10)
by Stephen Gallagher 10 Mar '15

10 Mar '15

========================================================= #fedora-meeting-1: Server SIG Weekly Meeting (2015-03-10) ========================================================= Meeting started by sgallagh at 15:00:39 UTC. The full logs are available at http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2015-03-10/fedora-meeting… . Meeting summary --------------- * roll call (sgallagh, 15:00:39) * Alpha is released. Hurray! (sgallagh, 15:01:17) * Agenda (sgallagh, 15:05:46) * Agenda Item: Fedora 22 Beta Planning (sgallagh, 15:05:55) * Agenda Item: GSoC Involvement (sgallagh, 15:06:06) * Agenda Item: DB Role Criteria and Test Cases (sgallagh, 15:07:34) * Fedora 22 Beta Planning (sgallagh, 15:07:41) * Rolekit Database Role needs to support decommissioning. (sgallagh, 15:10:38) * Non-blocking: Rolekit Database Role support for multiple DB instances. (sgallagh, 15:20:55) * Cockpit will have branding reintroduced to the Fedora builds in time for Beta Freeze (sgallagh, 15:21:48) * Cockpit is aiming upstream to achieve API stability as of Fedora 22 Beta (and further releases) (sgallagh, 15:22:18) * Cockpit will make PCP support optional before F22 Beta, because it's not finished. (sgallagh, 15:23:16) * Please run through the Beta release criteria for Fedora Server 22 by next week's meeting (2015-03-17) (sgallagh, 15:30:50) * use the Alpha Server netinst image, or grab a nightly. to find nightlies: fedfind images --release 22 --date YYYYMMDD --type boot (sgallagh, 15:31:59) * DB Role Criteria and Test Cases (sgallagh, 15:35:06) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Dmossor/DBRoleReqs (sgallagh, 15:35:24) * LINK: http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.4/static/auth-methods.html#GSSAPI- AUTH rather (mitr, 15:48:01) * ACTION: adamw to send email today about DB role use cases (sgallagh, 15:56:09) * GSoC Involvement (sgallagh, 15:56:22) * LINK: http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.4/static/auth-methods.html (danofsatx, 15:56:22) Meeting ended at 16:03:02 UTC. Action Items ------------ * adamw to send email today about DB role use cases Action Items, by person ----------------------- * adamw * adamw to send email today about DB role use cases * **UNASSIGNED** * (none) People Present (lines said) --------------------------- * sgallagh (120) * adamw (55) * nirik (20) * mitr (13) * simo (10) * danofsatx (9) * zodbot (5) * jsmith (4) * stefw (0) * tuanta (0) * mizmo (0) Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4 .. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot

1 0

Call for agenda for 2015-03-10 Server SIG meeting
by Stephen Gallagher 10 Mar '15

10 Mar '15

We need to plan for Beta, now that Alpha is out the door. Also whether we have any Google Summer of Code tasks available.

1 0

2015-03-09 @ 1600 UTC ** NOTE NEW TIME ** Fedora Blocker Review Meeting
by Mike Ruckman 08 Mar '15

08 Mar '15

# F22 Blocker Review meeting # Date: 2015-03-90 # Time: 1600 UTC # Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net Well, Alpha is set to head out into the wild and that means that now we've got to start checking in on the Beta release! We've got 2 blocker proposals for Beta to check out and 1 for final. We'll be having our meeting right after the QA meeting at 1500 UTC, like usual - but the time changes tonight for NA so our UTC timeslot gets bumped an hour. If you have time tomorrow, to take a look at the proposed or accepted blockers before the meeting - the full list can be found here: https://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/ Make sure to click through the milestones to see how many we have before the meeting! We'll be evaluating these bugs to see if they violate any of the Release Criteria and warrant the blocking of a release if they're not fixed. Information on the release criteria for F22 can be found on the wiki [0]. For more information about the Blocker and Freeze exception process, check out these links: - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_blocker_bug_process - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_freeze_exception_bug_process And for those of you who are curious how a Blocker Review Meeting works - or how it's supposed to go and you want to run one - check out the SOP on the wiki: - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting Have a good weekend and see you Monday! [0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Release_Criteria -- // Mike -- Fedora QA freenode: roshi http://roshi.fedorapeople.org

1 0

Re: cockpit not enable by default?
by Chris Murphy 05 Mar '15

05 Mar '15

On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 6:13 PM, David Malcolm <dmalcolm(a)redhat.com> wrote: > From what I can see, you both faithfully followed the instructions in: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Server_cockpit_default#How_to_te… > so if it's the intention for the cockpit service to be socket-activated > (which sounds sane), I guess that that section needs changing or > updating accordingly. > > Any ideas what the text of that testcase *ought* to read? Is there some > standard testcase rubric for testing a systemd socket-activated service? Maybe this testcase can be dropped entirely? https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Server_cockpit_default Because this one tests actual functionality: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Server_cockpit_basic -- Chris Murphy

3 2

cockpit not enable by default?
by Chris Murphy 04 Mar '15

04 Mar '15

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Server_cockpit_default "As far as you can reasonably test, Cockpit must be enabled and accessible on the test system after installation" [root@f22s ~]# systemctl status cockpit ● cockpit.service - Cockpit Web Server Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/cockpit.service; static; vendor preset: disabled) Active: inactive (dead) Docs: man:cockpit-ws(8) [root@f22s ~]# systemctl start cockpit [root@f22s ~]# systemctl status cockpit ● cockpit.service - Cockpit Web Server Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/cockpit.service; static; vendor preset: disabled) Active: active (running) since Wed 2015-03-04 13:17:10 MST; 6s ago Docs: man:cockpit-ws(8) Process: 1425 ExecStartPre=/usr/sbin/remotectl certificate --ensure --user=root --group=cockpit-ws (code=exited, status=0/SUCCESS) Main PID: 1429 (cockpit-ws) CGroup: /system.slice/cockpit.service └─1429 /usr/libexec/cockpit-ws Mar 04 13:17:10 f22s.localdomain systemd[1]: Starting Cockpit Web Server... Mar 04 13:17:10 f22s.localdomain remotectl[1425]: Generating temporary certificate using: openssl req -x509 -days 36500 -newkey rsa...domain Mar 04 13:17:10 f22s.localdomain systemd[1]: Started Cockpit Web Server. Mar 04 13:17:11 f22s.localdomain cockpit-ws[1429]: Using certificate: /etc/cockpit/ws-certs.d/~self-signed.cert Mar 04 13:17:11 f22s.localdomain cockpit-ws[1429]: HTTP Server listening on port 9090 Hint: Some lines were ellipsized, use -l to show in full. Should I file a bug? -- Chris Murphy

2 2

Fedora 22 Alpha release announcement
by Jaroslav Reznik 04 Mar '15

04 Mar '15

Hey everyone! As Fedora 22 Alpha is coming, the readiness meeting is this week, I'd like to have draft release announcement draft written prior the meeting, sooner than later (even there's still possibility of Alpha delays). Crossposting so this email finds the right people to provide the content :). As always, place to coordinate/write announcement is at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/F22_Alpha_release_announcement It's basic template based on F21 Alpha announcement. Thanks Jaroslav

3 3

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

server March 2015