Dear Ahmed

> Am 31.10.2021 um 13:39 schrieb Ahmed Almeleh <aalmeleh.whatever.0101@gmail.com>:
>
> I didn't yet test the server variant of the x86_64 architecture of Fedora 35 RC 1.2 manually; however I have tested some of the base images for Fedora workstation 35 RC 1.1 for the MATE spin. All of which passed. Also I tested the "Everything netinst" for Fedora Workstation 35 RC 1.2 that passed as well. Majority of the tests are ran by Coconut, one of the bots. Mostly through openQA. If required I can test the server server variant of the x86_64 architecture of Fedora 35 RC 1.2 manually. I do think that manual testing is better as bots are able to sometimes become faulty.

many many thanks for your offering. I'm afraid it's too late now for testing the installation. F35 is go and Tuesday is release time. Now one can only hope.  But it would be very helpful if we could count on your help for rawhide / F36.

I really don’t know what is best to do. I’m wondering (and worrying) how these issues came about. In fact, I don't even know what is tested per bot in detail. With workstations, there are likely to be hardware and driver peculiarities (different graphics adapters, proprietary wifi, etc.). With headless servers, many things do not even arise. How does the workstation WG organize all of that?


Thanks
Peter
_______________________________________________
server mailing list -- server@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to server-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/server@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure