On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 15:36, Dan Horák <dan(a)danny.cz> wrote:
seth vidal píše v Po 30. 08. 2010 v 15:27 -0400:
> On Mon, 2010-08-30 at 15:13 -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
>
> > Right. But don't you think this group could at least come up with a list
> > of proposals, or even one proposal? It could include a longer support
> > timeframe, but also detail how Fedora is not friendly to Server today.
>
> It needs a longer support lifetime and/or a slower update rate.
>
> I think that's really all.
slower update rate - I don't think the core required for running server
services changes so often and the server services itself also don't have
too many updates, I've not done any analysis though
PS: I know I don't give this project as much time as I originally
planned, but the work on Fedora/s390x takes a lot of time and we see it
as an investment into the future. The dinosaurus will be here for a long
time :-)
Should we try and experiment with a 'sub' distribution? Say take
Fedora 12 and keep it running for 18 months? [Lets not get into how
this will fail... how could we make it work?]
--
Stephen J Smoogen.
“The core skill of innovators is error recovery, not failure avoidance.”
Randy Nelson, President of Pixar University.
"We have a strategic plan. It's called doing things.""
— Herb Kelleher, founder Southwest Airlines