Yeah, let's please not revisit the fight? This was a system-wide change
approved by FESCo. I do support Fedora Editions (and, for that matter,
really, non-Editions) making their own choices for their intended audience,
and I can _definitely_ see that certainly vi and probably vim is a
reasonable thing to have installed on Fedora Server, but if you want to
deviate from the recently-approved change, that should go back to FESCo.

I know the degree of autonomy here is a little vague.... but that's _why_ we
have FESCo, and the Editions working groups technically defined as under
FESCo. That's the place to hash it out.

Although, really, in this case, I hope we don't re-hash. If the Server WG
_does_ have a decided desire to make this different, it'd be helpful for the
case to come with data, and fit clearly into the story told by the refreshed
PRD. And, also, please weigh the cost to documentation and support in having
a different expectation for editor defaults.

--
Matthew Miller
<mattdm@fedoraproject.org>
Fedora Project Leader
_______________________________________________
server mailing list -- server@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to server-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/server@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure