Re: Fedora Server lifecycle

[Reindl Harald]

Am 04.04.2015 um 11:26 schrieb Franklin Wang:
>  I don't think so. Red Hat don't like CentOS very much, for
> it's not
>  another product, and no income for Red Hat. 
*lol* you have no clue about the philosophy of Redhat and if you would
read serious IT news at least 5 years back you would have heard multiple
times from the CEO itself that they have no problem with CentOS because
over the long it brings new customers when they need support with and 
easy migration path and the other CentOS users wouldn't be anyways customers

at least after 2014 "Red Hat don't like CentOS very much" is just 
laughable because 
http://www.redhat.com/de/about/press-releases/red-hat-and-centos-join-forces

as well as

Domain Name:CENTOS.ORG
Registrant Name:Red Hat, Inc.
Registrant Organization:Red Hat, Inc.
Registrant Street: 100 East Davie Street
Registrant City:Raleigh
Registrant State/Province:NC
Registrant Postal Code:27601
Registrant Country:US
Registrant Phone:[phone]
Registrant Phone Ext:
Registrant Fax: [phone]
Registrant Fax Ext:
Registrant Email:[e-mail]

so please inform yourself *before* talking nonsense

>  On 04/04/2015 04:59 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> >
> >
> > Am 04.04.2015 um 10:54 schrieb Franklin Wang:
> >> Would the Fedora Server replace CentOS in the future?
> >
> > don't get me wrong but that question is nonsense
> >
> > CentOS is a completly different project based on RHEL and so no one
>  will replace the other in any direction