On Mon, 2010-11-15 at 20:34 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Jesse Keating (jkeating(a)redhat.com) said:
> > Do you think it's appropriate to keep it this way or should I change it?
> > The reason why I do it this way is, that pungi doesn't pull optional
> > comps packages in the media kit. Any idea how to work this around
> > without having an extra script?
>
> To date, all spins have been either live media, or a virt image that is
> quite similar. However you mention using pungi, which means you're
> making a more traditional install media, as opposed to live media.
> Basically you're just adjusting what packages are or are not on the DVD
> media we generate as part of a Fedora release?
... I'm confused why you'd do this as well. How many people install their
servers from *media*? (That being said, it would be interesting to
benchmark an image-based installation of @core, but given that anaconda
won't run on that...)
I always install my own servers from "media". Often it's an ISO given to
a VM, but it is always from an ISO. Never a pre-packaged image, etc.
Jon.