Jesse Keating (jkeating(a)redhat.com) said:
> Do you think it's appropriate to keep it this way or should
I change it?
> The reason why I do it this way is, that pungi doesn't pull optional
> comps packages in the media kit. Any idea how to work this around
> without having an extra script?
To date, all spins have been either live media, or a virt image that is
quite similar. However you mention using pungi, which means you're
making a more traditional install media, as opposed to live media.
Basically you're just adjusting what packages are or are not on the DVD
media we generate as part of a Fedora release?
... I'm confused why you'd do this as well. How many people install their
servers from *media*? (That being said, it would be interesting to
benchmark an image-based installation of @core, but given that anaconda
won't run on that...)
Bill