On 23 September 2016 at 09:23, Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>> Please offer feedback on the current state, particularly
additional content in
>> the same style. (If you log in to the Kolinahr instance, I think you should be
>> able to just edit it directly, so feel free to make new additions at will, but
>> please don't delete anything without first discussing it on the list).
>>
OK, so is what we have on Kolinahr right now
* Enough work for one year?
* Too much work for one year?
I think it may be too much work for one year. I don't have a problem
with over-reaching but I really want to make sure this isn't a charge
of the light brigade to get it done. Let us be honest here, the people
working on this are going to be the people on the committee and in
their 'free' time from all their other work.
I think from that lack of manpower we should just focus on one things
at a time and 'get-er-done' as best we can.
Followed by:
* Who is going to work on which pieces?
* Who is going to write the new PRD?
Also, while this covers the end-user features we want to support, it doesn't
necessarily cover any changes we want to make to the OS itself.
I'd like to suggest the following to the Outcomes:
"Users of Fedora Server Edition have a very limited attack surface in the
default installation".
Which would come from the following outputs:
* Minimal viable install set content
* Highly-restrictive firewall defaults
And activities:
* Define a minimal package set for install media
* Research the optimum firewall state
Beyond that, we also probably want to have another Outcome:
"Users of Fedora Server Edition have a reliable update mechanism"
Outputs:
* ostree-based installation type
Activities
* Create ostree repository for Server Edition
* Establish hosting for ostree repository
Another Outcome:
"Users of Fedora Server Edition can install it on most hardware and popular
cloud providers"
Outputs:
* Install media for hardware - traditional
* Install media for hardware - ostree
* AMI image (Consider only one or the other for this...)
* OpenStack-compatible image
Yet another:
"Users can deploy Fedora Server automatically"
Outputs:
* Deployment Role (built atop PXE, DHCP, tftp; maybe cobbler)
Hit me with some more ideas! I'll add these to the Kolinahr page for now; we can
do prioritization later.
_______________________________________________
server mailing list -- server(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to server-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
--
Stephen J Smoogen.