On Thu, 2014-06-12 at 19:39 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2014-06-11 at 17:14 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-06-06 at 15:55 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > Hi, folks. Here's my initial dump of proposed release criteria specific
> > to Server. This is primarily a Server WG responsibility (per the draft
> > test plan -
> >
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Adamwill/Draft_Fedora_21_test_plan -
> > and the discussion of same), but CCing test@ as I know some folks there
> > will be interested. Please ensure follow-ups *at least* go to server@
> > (no follow-ups only to test@.)
>
> I've now cleaned up three of the proposed criteria and posted them in
> the 'stock format' here:
>
>
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Adamwill/Draft_server_release_criteria
I've revised this page again today based on the feedback received so
far. Notably, I've tried to make the requirement for both ends of log
forwarding to work more clear - I'm still assuming this is actually what
we want, if we only want to mandate client not server, someone speak up.
I added the remote authentication criterion, with a requirement that it
be possible at install time but a stipulation that only being possible
non-interactively (via kickstart) is fine. I removed the explicit
requirement as regards how conflicts between Role and user-specified
firewall config should be resolved.
Today I've revised the criteria again, adding a set of server role
criteria derived from the tech spec. That URL again:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Adamwill/Draft_server_release_criteria
review would be appreciated.
Should we include a criterion requiring remote management of server
roles on a Fedora Server machine to work? How do we envisage this being
configured - at install time? Immediately post-install? From kickstart?
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net