-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 01/16/2014 04:03 PM, Máirín Duffy wrote:
Hi,
On 01/15/2014 08:21 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> I respectfully request that all members of the Server Working
> Group (CCed) respond with an approval vote, or if they feel
> something requires changing, please describe it in detail.
+1 from me.
I do want to note that I made some minor typo corrections, and I
also changed the mission statement as follows (as discussed in IRC
yesterday):
BEFORE: Fedora Server is a common base platform with "featured
application stacks" built on top of it. We commit to produce, test,
and distribute these application stacks.
AFTER: Fedora Server is a common base platform with "featured
server roles" built on top of it. We commit to produce, test, and
distribute these server roles.
The discussion/rationale in IRC was basically along the lines that
"application stacks" is a loaded term that could introduce
confusion (e.g., "I thought the Cloud WG did that,") and the
statement was meant to specifically refer to server roles in the
first place. It's clearer to just use the "server roles" language
there, I think.
Make sense?
With my own +1, I believe that's all nine of us. Hooray!
I'll get this submitted for review promptly.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird -
http://www.enigmail.net/
iEYEARECAAYFAlLZK+kACgkQeiVVYja6o6NoFQCeNC6nlmErKfObTFYzuwDJas9p
ZPMAn1MbOqE7mFs55lKNJiVnfyCYP1Nq
=cMZE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----