* Neal Gompa [05/06/2022 18:45] :
Moreover, this "threat" was *after* the Change was approved.
Yes, this is pretty much the point I've been making. Because the
Change owners did not really engage with Peter, he's left with the only
option of introducing a test for software RAID to the QA tests so that
the Change doesn't break it (or gets reverted if it does).
Am I not allowed to go on vacation?
Obviously, you're allowed to go on vacation. This does not justify the
lack of discusion these last 3 weeks from all 4 of the Change owners.
Am I not allowed to go on vacation? Chris was answering as well, and
Chris had zero participation on the subject in the 22-05-18 meeting.
Needless to say, this is not the level of engagement I expect from Change
owners.
As for my "cavalier" comment, I work with many servers as
part of my
day to day work, and it's simply not a thing that comes up.
I don't use software raid either but if I were the owner of a Change
that breaks it, I would have noted it in the Change proposal and
engaged with the Fedora users who use software raid before the approval
of the Change.
Emmanuel