Thanks for your answer, Well my main concern in this use case (freeipa
environment) is the complexity of IPA it depend of many stuff and can be
easily broken if any of them fails. About the lifecycle I would not expect
5 years like ubuntu actually the draft proposal is pretty good to me,i
would like security update in the time between the release and seamlessly
upgrade between major software version. If i push fedora into production i
will require alike scenario lab to test the incoming changes and feedback
the community. Regards
2015-04-03 17:47 GMT-04:00 Stephen John Smoogen <smooge(a)gmail.com>:
On 3 April 2015 at 15:39, Carlos Raúl Laguna <carlosla1987(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hello to everyone,
> I have a question about lifecycle, i read the draft proposal
>
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Server/Proposals/Server_Lifecycle , but
> that is 2013 old ? Any actual news on this, i am about to deploy a
> freeipa environment in one hand i have centos 7 ipa 4.1.0 and Fedora 21
> server 4.1.2 with several bugs corrected in the other can anyone point
> me some more recent direction in this topic. Regard
>
>
As far as I know, lifecycle is still the same as the main Fedora lifecycle
of one year from release. Part of this is that there is a lot still going
on in setting up the Server group. Trying to add in extended lifecycles and
such would happen after the basics of what was in Fedora Server were in
place. It also requires users like you to explain what they want in an
extended lifecycle and what resources they are going to bring to help meet
those needs.
> _______________________________________________
> server mailing list
> server(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/server
>
--
Stephen J Smoogen.
_______________________________________________
server mailing list
server(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/server