Thanks for your answer, Well my main concern in this use case (freeipa environment) is the complexity of IPA it depend of many stuff and can be easily broken if any of them fails. About the lifecycle I would not expect 5 years like ubuntu actually the draft proposal is pretty good to me,i would like security update in the time between the release and seamlessly upgrade between major software version. If i push fedora into production i will require alike scenario lab to test the incoming changes and feedback the community. Regards

2015-04-03 17:47 GMT-04:00 Stephen John Smoogen <smooge@gmail.com>:


On 3 April 2015 at 15:39, Carlos Raúl Laguna <carlosla1987@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello to everyone,
I have a question about lifecycle, i read the draft proposal https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Server/Proposals/Server_Lifecycle , but that is 2013 old ? Any actual news on this, i am about to deploy a freeipa environment in one hand i have centos 7 ipa 4.1.0 and Fedora 21 server 4.1.2 with several bugs corrected in the other can anyone point me some more recent direction in this topic. Regard


As far as I know, lifecycle is still the same as the main Fedora lifecycle of one year from release. Part of this is that there is a lot still going on in setting up the Server group. Trying to add in extended lifecycles and such would happen after the basics of what was in Fedora Server were in place. It also requires users like you to explain what they want in an extended lifecycle and what resources they are going to bring to help meet those needs.

 
_______________________________________________
server mailing list
server@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/server



--
Stephen J Smoogen.


_______________________________________________
server mailing list
server@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/server