On Thu, 2013-10-31 at 18:49 -0400, Máirín Duffy wrote:
On 10/31/2013 06:42 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> So, to give an alternative proposal: "Active participant in the server
> WG" would be sufficiently targeted for me, simple enough (... and
> equally unenforceable).
+1 That seems fair to me. I think you'd have to have the experience to
have the interest to actively participate anyway :)
+1 let's not burden ourselves too much with rules, when we'll see the
need we'll add them in due course.
Simo.
--
Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York