On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 3:18 PM, Adam Williamson
On Tue, 2017-11-07 at 08:22 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 8:16 AM, Máirín Duffy <duffy(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> > Hi Andrea,
> > On 11/07/2017 06:08 AM, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> > > For users who have not been paying close attention to recent Fedora
> > > development, and are just downloading the Fedora Server 27 .iso
> > > expecting it to be "Fedora Server 26, but with newer software",
> > > installing the new OS and hitting something like that right away
> > > could lead to some frustration. Looking up more information about
> > > Modularity would certainly explain things in a satisfactory manner,
> > > but the importance of first impressions should not be underestimated.
> > Isn't that going to be the case with every Fedora edition?
> How? Server is the only Edition using a Modular release for F27.
> I would suggest that the absence of a classic Server that is in line
> with every other Edition for F27 (and likely F28) is what will
> primarily lead to confusion. As Andrea outlined, the user experience
> between F26 and F27 Server is going to be fairly different.
Just to stir the pot a bit: if I install Fedora 26 Server and then use
dnf system-upgrade to upgrade it to Fedora 27, what operating system am
I'm guessing... a non-Edition at that point?