SELinux in fedora SIG

[Deependra Singh Shekhawat]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi,

I have just joined the mailing list and I would like to be part of this
SIG as I have been teaching Redhat based courses for quite a while.
Myself had done RHCE plus RHCSS and after finishing up with my RHCSS I
have felt that there is a lack of concern about SELinux in general
within the Linux server community. I would love to see SELinux as a
point in our goals to achieve.

Also I quite like the idea about a spin for fedora server stuff only. I
would like to contribute to this and other projects going on within this
SIG. Please let me know how could I be of any benefit.

And do we have a IRC channel yet to start discussion.

For more information on me: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Deepsa

Thanks

- --
Type: pub
bits/keyID: 1024D/483B234C
Date: 2007/06/29
Key Server: pgp.mit.edu
User ID: Deependra Singh Shekhawat (Fedora Project)
 
Key fingerprint: ED45 62EA A4D7 53FB 44C7  774A D55B F3F0 483B 234C
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAkk1KlIACgkQ1Vvz8Eg7I0wqMwCfWZE6TvKlhCAHI6Soz+ztm9Nw
> g9MAoLudHHrVFO1oiHmybY5TgNRdX4S4
> =whef
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[Dan Horák]

Deependra Singh Shekhawat píše v Út 02. 12. 2008 v 18:00 +0530:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi,
>
> I have just joined the mailing list and I would like to be part of this
> SIG as I have been teaching Redhat based courses for quite a while.
> Myself had done RHCE plus RHCSS and after finishing up with my RHCSS I
> have felt that there is a lack of concern about SELinux in general
> within the Linux server community. I would love to see SELinux as a
> point in our goals to achieve.

Yes, SELinux is a never-ending and important part of Fedora and
"Security" is already one of our defined work areas
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Server#Security). One important
task can be going through the bugzilla and look for SELinux related ones
(e.g. #437707, #438488 or #465991) and help the maintainers here to
reproduce and analyze the problems and forward the fixes into the
official selinux policy. Or check whether all server packages (question
is how to find "server packages" :-) ) have a SELinux policy, etc.
> Also I quite like the idea about a spin for fedora server stuff only. I
> would like to contribute to this and other projects going on within this
> SIG. Please let me know how could I be of any benefit.

You can join a task in an already defined area or try to define new
ones :-)
> And do we have a IRC channel yet to start discussion.

It wasn't decided yet, but #fedora-server looks logical.

Dan

[Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski]

On Tuesday, 02 December 2008 at 15:10, Dan Horák wrote:
> Deependra Singh Shekhawat píše v Út 02. 12. 2008 v 18:00 +0530:

[...]
> > And do we have a IRC channel yet to start discussion.
>
> It wasn't decided yet, but #fedora-server looks logical.

I went ahead and registered it with ChanServ so it doesn't get lost.

Regards,
R.