Agenda for Server SIG Weekly Meeting (2016-10-04)

[Stephen Gallagher]

We need to approve the logic model (or make last-minute changes to it) then go
through a prioritization cycle.

There's some open question about whether we want to add notes about cloud image
needs into it; that discussion should happen on the list today if possible...

[Kevin Fenzi]

On Mon, 3 Oct 2016 08:47:14 -0400
Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote:

>  We need to approve the logic model (or make last-minute changes to
>  it) then go through a prioritization cycle.
>  
>  There's some open question about whether we want to add notes about
>  cloud image needs into it; that discussion should happen on the list
>  today if possible... 
Well, I'd like a openstack image. I'm fine if thats the existing cloud
base one or a server base one (with whatever server bits). 

kevin

[Major Hayden]

On 10/03/2016 02:06 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>  Well, I'd like a openstack image. I'm fine if thats the
> existing cloud
>  base one or a server base one (with whatever server bits).  
Same here.  I usually end up building my own or trying some `dnf groupinstall` action
after bringing up the cloud image. ;)

--
Major Hayden

[Dusty Mabe]

On 10/03/2016 03:06 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>  On Mon, 3 Oct 2016 08:47:14 -0400
>  Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote:
>  
> > We need to approve the logic model (or make last-minute changes to
> > it) then go through a prioritization cycle.
> >
> > There's some open question about whether we want to add notes about
> > cloud image needs into it; that discussion should happen on the list
> > today if possible...
>  
>  Well, I'd like a openstack image. I'm fine if thats the existing cloud
>  base one or a server base one (with whatever server bits). 
>   
Agreed. After talking with sgallagh a week back we believe that
"server" in the future will be a lot more minimal and probably align 
well with the package set that is in the cloud base image today, so 
we should be able to get a "cloud" image from the work the server WG
is doing without much effort. 

It will take some work though, so I think we can identify some
interested parties and have them be involved in the server WG. It
looks like Major and Kevin are both interested as well as myself so
there is a start.

Dusty