Requests for Server SIG agenda (2016-08-23)

[Stephen Gallagher]

First order of business will be addressing the open seats; as of right now,
neither Dan Mossor (danofsatx) nor Danishka Navin (hanthana) have replied to the
"continued interest" thread, so it is likely that both of their seats will be
up
for consideration.

At present, we have at least one self-nomination for an open seat: Stephen
Smoogen (smooge). It was unclear to me whether any of the other respondents to
the WhenIsGood were self-nominating.

Once the seats are decided, we will pick our new meeting time. Right now, the
optimum time would appear to be 1500 US/Eastern (1900 UTC) on either Tuesdays or
Thursdays which would accommodate everyone who replied except for linuxmodder
(sorry, Corey).

I'll express a slight preference to taking the Tuesday slot, as it gives us a
last chance to discuss things before Go/No-Go meetings at the various Fedora
milestones.


If anyone else would like to raise an agenda item for tomorrow's meeting, please
speak up.

[Jon Stanley]

On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 12:04 PM, Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote:

>  At present, we have at least one self-nomination for an open seat:
> Stephen
>  Smoogen (smooge). It was unclear to me whether any of the other respondents to
>  the WhenIsGood were self-nominating. 
I'm unfortunately going to have to miss the meeting tomorrow - but I'm
+1 to this nomination.

>  I'll express a slight preference to taking the Tuesday slot, as
> it gives us a
>  last chance to discuss things before Go/No-Go meetings at the various Fedora
>  milestones. 
Just from a logistical perspective for me, Tuesday would probably be
easier as well, so I'll go ahead and express that preference for both
reasons :)

[Kevin Fenzi]

On Mon, 22 Aug 2016 12:04:46 -0400
Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote:

>  First order of business will be addressing the open seats; as of
>  right now, neither Dan Mossor (danofsatx) nor Danishka Navin
>  (hanthana) have replied to the "continued interest" thread, so it is
>  likely that both of their seats will be up for consideration.
>  
>  At present, we have at least one self-nomination for an open seat:
>  Stephen Smoogen (smooge). It was unclear to me whether any of the
>  other respondents to the WhenIsGood were self-nominating. 
Dunno. I am +1 to smooge. ;) 
>  
>  Once the seats are decided, we will pick our new meeting time. Right
>  now, the optimum time would appear to be 1500 US/Eastern (1900 UTC)
>  on either Tuesdays or Thursdays which would accommodate everyone who
>  replied except for linuxmodder (sorry, Corey).
>
>  I'll express a slight preference to taking the Tuesday slot, as it
>  gives us a last chance to discuss things before Go/No-Go meetings at
>  the various Fedora milestones. 
Tuesday would work better for me as well, but I can do thursday if
needed.  
 
>  If anyone else would like to raise an agenda item for tomorrow's
>  meeting, please speak up. 
We should possibly discuss f26 plans. Are there things we should start
in motion now? (changes filing, etc)? Might want to cross discuss more
with modularity folks tho. 

kevin

[Stephen John Smoogen]

On 22 August 2016 at 12:04, Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote:
>  First order of business will be addressing the open seats; as of
> right now,
>  neither Dan Mossor (danofsatx) nor Danishka Navin (hanthana) have replied to the
>  "continued interest" thread, so it is likely that both of their seats will be
> up
>  for consideration.
>
>  At present, we have at least one self-nomination for an open seat: Stephen
>  Smoogen (smooge). It was unclear to me whether any of the other respondents to
>  the WhenIsGood were self-nominating.
>  
I do not think I will be able to make tomorrow's meeting but will make
next Tuesdays whether or not I am on the committee.

-- 
Stephen J Smoogen.

[Stephen Gallagher]

On 08/22/2016 12:04 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>  First order of business will be addressing the open seats; as of
> right now,
>  neither Dan Mossor (danofsatx) nor Danishka Navin (hanthana) have replied to the
>  "continued interest" thread, so it is likely that both of their seats will be
> up
>  for consideration.
>  
>  At present, we have at least one self-nomination for an open seat: Stephen
>  Smoogen (smooge). It was unclear to me whether any of the other respondents to
>  the WhenIsGood were self-nominating.
>  
>  Once the seats are decided, we will pick our new meeting time. Right now, the
>  optimum time would appear to be 1500 US/Eastern (1900 UTC) on either Tuesdays or
>  Thursdays which would accommodate everyone who replied except for linuxmodder
>  (sorry, Corey).
>  
>  I'll express a slight preference to taking the Tuesday slot, as it gives us a
>  last chance to discuss things before Go/No-Go meetings at the various Fedora
>  milestones.
>  
>  
>  If anyone else would like to raise an agenda item for tomorrow's meeting, please
>  speak up.
>   

OK, so it looks like I made a mistake with my own availability. It turns out
that the 3pm slot is non-ideal for me as I'll be waiting for my daughter's
school bus to arrive between 3:15 and 3:30. So running a meeting during that
span would be difficult (but not strictly impossible).

Looking at the WhenIsGood, Tuesdays or Thursdays at 4pm US/Eastern (2000 UTC)
are also open. I originally moved for the 3pm meeting mostly so we'd have that
spill-over time if we needed it, but would anyone be tremendously opposed to
just picking the hour later as the meeting time instead?

If not, I can find a way to make the earlier time work, but it may mean
disappearing at random.

[Jon Stanley]

On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 2:57 PM, Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote:

>  Looking at the WhenIsGood, Tuesdays or Thursdays at 4pm US/Eastern
> (2000 UTC)
>  are also open. I originally moved for the 3pm meeting mostly so we'd have that
>  spill-over time if we needed it, but would anyone be tremendously opposed to
>  just picking the hour later as the meeting time instead? 
4PM is good with me as well :)

[Justin W. Flory]

Hi all,

I double-checked the mailing list to see if anyone asked about this before me, but I
couldn't find any mention of in HyperKitty. If I missed something somewhere and this
is a repeat request, please point me to the original discussion and I won't waste your
time. :)

One request I'd like to put out there is helping the Marketing team compile talking
points about all that's new in the Fedora 25 Server edition. This will be helpful for
us to compile information to pass along to the Ambassadors in the field and also for
writing the upcoming release announcement for the Alpha. You can see the wiki page where
these will go here:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_25_talking_points

For previous examples of talking points, you can refer to this page (ideally, they should
look like this one):

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_24_talking_points

If you could either edit the page directly or email the Marketing mailing list with the
points for inclusion, either method would be fine. Thanks much!

[Corey W Sheldon]

On 23.08.2016 05:48, Justin W. Flory wrote: 

>  Hi all,
>  
>  I double-checked the mailing list to see if anyone asked about this before me, but I
> couldn't find any mention of in HyperKitty. If I missed something somewhere and this
> is a repeat request, please point me to the original discussion and I won't waste your
> time. :)
>  
>  One request I'd like to put out there is helping the Marketing team compile talking
> points about all that's new in the Fedora 25 Server edition. This will be helpful for
> us to compile information to pass along to the Ambassadors in the field and also for
> writing the upcoming release announcement for the Alpha. You can see the wiki page where
> these will go here:
>  
>  https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_25_talking_points [1]
>  
>  For previous examples of talking points, you can refer to this page (ideally, they should
> look like this one):
>  
>  https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_24_talking_points [2]
>  
>  If you could either edit the page directly or email the Marketing mailing list with the
> points for inclusion, either method would be fine. Thanks much!
>  _______________________________________________
>  server mailing list
>  server(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>  https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/[e-mail] [3] 
Justin, 

This was asked by me two weeks ago in a mtg and on the ML, 

plan was to have some feedback ready by next week's mtg ( that may slip
tho due to changed times and all of meeting, I will however give
whatever feedback we do have by the next mktg meeting for you ( I may
even have time to start a stub branch for it by then. 
-- 

Corey W Sheldon
ph: +1 (310).909.7672
0x8B4E89435A88E539 0x59276298D2264944

Freelance IT Consultant, Multi-Discipline Tutor
Fedora AmbaNA (linuxmodder)
Ameridea LLC Founder, President

Find me elsewhere:
https://gist.github.com/linux-modder/ac5dc6fa211315c633c9

"One must never underestimate the power of boredom...from which
creativity and laziness are borne, which can spark great works of chaos
and genius." --Anonymous

"Any man willing to retreat freedom for security is deserving of
neither." (Pp) -- Benjamin Franklin. 

This document, including attachments, is intended for the person or
company named and contains confidential and/or legally privileged
information. Unauthorized disclosure, copying or use of this information
may be unlawful and is prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please destroy this message and notify the sender.
 

Links:
------
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_25_talking_points
[2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_24_talking_points
[3]
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/[e-mail]

[Vinny Valdez]

On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 11:04 AM, Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh(a)redhat.com&gt;
wrote:

>  First order of business will be addressing the open seats; as of
> right now,
>  neither Dan Mossor (danofsatx) nor Danishka Navin (hanthana) have replied
>  to the
>  "continued interest" thread, so it is likely that both of their seats will
>  be up
>  for consideration.
>
>  At present, we have at least one self-nomination for an open seat: Stephen
>  Smoogen (smooge). It was unclear to me whether any of the other
>  respondents to
>  the WhenIsGood were self-nominating.
>
>  Once the seats are decided, we will pick our new meeting time. Right now,
>  the
>  optimum time would appear to be 1500 US/Eastern (1900 UTC) on either
>  Tuesdays or
>  Thursdays which would accommodate everyone who replied except for
>  linuxmodder
>  (sorry, Corey).
>
>  I'll express a slight preference to taking the Tuesday slot, as it gives
>  us a
>  last chance to discuss things before Go/No-Go meetings at the various
>  Fedora
>  milestones.
>
>
>  If anyone else would like to raise an agenda item for tomorrow's meeting,
>  please
>  speak up.
>  
Hi Stephen, I'd like to nominate myself if there is still an open seat.

Regards,

Vinny