First order of business will be addressing the open seats; as of right now, neither Dan Mossor (danofsatx) nor Danishka Navin (hanthana) have replied to the "continued interest" thread, so it is likely that both of their seats will be up for consideration.
At present, we have at least one self-nomination for an open seat: Stephen Smoogen (smooge). It was unclear to me whether any of the other respondents to the WhenIsGood were self-nominating.
Once the seats are decided, we will pick our new meeting time. Right now, the optimum time would appear to be 1500 US/Eastern (1900 UTC) on either Tuesdays or Thursdays which would accommodate everyone who replied except for linuxmodder (sorry, Corey).
I'll express a slight preference to taking the Tuesday slot, as it gives us a last chance to discuss things before Go/No-Go meetings at the various Fedora milestones.
If anyone else would like to raise an agenda item for tomorrow's meeting, please speak up.
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 12:04 PM, Stephen Gallagher sgallagh@redhat.com wrote:
At present, we have at least one self-nomination for an open seat: Stephen Smoogen (smooge). It was unclear to me whether any of the other respondents to the WhenIsGood were self-nominating.
I'm unfortunately going to have to miss the meeting tomorrow - but I'm +1 to this nomination.
I'll express a slight preference to taking the Tuesday slot, as it gives us a last chance to discuss things before Go/No-Go meetings at the various Fedora milestones.
Just from a logistical perspective for me, Tuesday would probably be easier as well, so I'll go ahead and express that preference for both reasons :)
On Mon, 22 Aug 2016 12:04:46 -0400 Stephen Gallagher sgallagh@redhat.com wrote:
First order of business will be addressing the open seats; as of right now, neither Dan Mossor (danofsatx) nor Danishka Navin (hanthana) have replied to the "continued interest" thread, so it is likely that both of their seats will be up for consideration.
At present, we have at least one self-nomination for an open seat: Stephen Smoogen (smooge). It was unclear to me whether any of the other respondents to the WhenIsGood were self-nominating.
Dunno. I am +1 to smooge. ;)
Once the seats are decided, we will pick our new meeting time. Right now, the optimum time would appear to be 1500 US/Eastern (1900 UTC) on either Tuesdays or Thursdays which would accommodate everyone who replied except for linuxmodder (sorry, Corey).
I'll express a slight preference to taking the Tuesday slot, as it gives us a last chance to discuss things before Go/No-Go meetings at the various Fedora milestones.
Tuesday would work better for me as well, but I can do thursday if needed.
If anyone else would like to raise an agenda item for tomorrow's meeting, please speak up.
We should possibly discuss f26 plans. Are there things we should start in motion now? (changes filing, etc)? Might want to cross discuss more with modularity folks tho.
kevin
On 22 August 2016 at 12:04, Stephen Gallagher sgallagh@redhat.com wrote:
First order of business will be addressing the open seats; as of right now, neither Dan Mossor (danofsatx) nor Danishka Navin (hanthana) have replied to the "continued interest" thread, so it is likely that both of their seats will be up for consideration.
At present, we have at least one self-nomination for an open seat: Stephen Smoogen (smooge). It was unclear to me whether any of the other respondents to the WhenIsGood were self-nominating.
I do not think I will be able to make tomorrow's meeting but will make next Tuesdays whether or not I am on the committee.
On 08/22/2016 12:04 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
First order of business will be addressing the open seats; as of right now, neither Dan Mossor (danofsatx) nor Danishka Navin (hanthana) have replied to the "continued interest" thread, so it is likely that both of their seats will be up for consideration.
At present, we have at least one self-nomination for an open seat: Stephen Smoogen (smooge). It was unclear to me whether any of the other respondents to the WhenIsGood were self-nominating.
Once the seats are decided, we will pick our new meeting time. Right now, the optimum time would appear to be 1500 US/Eastern (1900 UTC) on either Tuesdays or Thursdays which would accommodate everyone who replied except for linuxmodder (sorry, Corey).
I'll express a slight preference to taking the Tuesday slot, as it gives us a last chance to discuss things before Go/No-Go meetings at the various Fedora milestones.
If anyone else would like to raise an agenda item for tomorrow's meeting, please speak up.
OK, so it looks like I made a mistake with my own availability. It turns out that the 3pm slot is non-ideal for me as I'll be waiting for my daughter's school bus to arrive between 3:15 and 3:30. So running a meeting during that span would be difficult (but not strictly impossible).
Looking at the WhenIsGood, Tuesdays or Thursdays at 4pm US/Eastern (2000 UTC) are also open. I originally moved for the 3pm meeting mostly so we'd have that spill-over time if we needed it, but would anyone be tremendously opposed to just picking the hour later as the meeting time instead?
If not, I can find a way to make the earlier time work, but it may mean disappearing at random.
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 2:57 PM, Stephen Gallagher sgallagh@redhat.com wrote:
Looking at the WhenIsGood, Tuesdays or Thursdays at 4pm US/Eastern (2000 UTC) are also open. I originally moved for the 3pm meeting mostly so we'd have that spill-over time if we needed it, but would anyone be tremendously opposed to just picking the hour later as the meeting time instead?
4PM is good with me as well :)
Hi all,
I double-checked the mailing list to see if anyone asked about this before me, but I couldn't find any mention of in HyperKitty. If I missed something somewhere and this is a repeat request, please point me to the original discussion and I won't waste your time. :)
One request I'd like to put out there is helping the Marketing team compile talking points about all that's new in the Fedora 25 Server edition. This will be helpful for us to compile information to pass along to the Ambassadors in the field and also for writing the upcoming release announcement for the Alpha. You can see the wiki page where these will go here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_25_talking_points
For previous examples of talking points, you can refer to this page (ideally, they should look like this one):
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_24_talking_points
If you could either edit the page directly or email the Marketing mailing list with the points for inclusion, either method would be fine. Thanks much!
On 23.08.2016 05:48, Justin W. Flory wrote:
Hi all,
I double-checked the mailing list to see if anyone asked about this before me, but I couldn't find any mention of in HyperKitty. If I missed something somewhere and this is a repeat request, please point me to the original discussion and I won't waste your time. :)
One request I'd like to put out there is helping the Marketing team compile talking points about all that's new in the Fedora 25 Server edition. This will be helpful for us to compile information to pass along to the Ambassadors in the field and also for writing the upcoming release announcement for the Alpha. You can see the wiki page where these will go here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_25_talking_points [1]
For previous examples of talking points, you can refer to this page (ideally, they should look like this one):
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_24_talking_points [2]
If you could either edit the page directly or email the Marketing mailing list with the points for inclusion, either method would be fine. Thanks much! _______________________________________________ server mailing list server@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/server@lists.fedoraproject.org [3]
Justin,
This was asked by me two weeks ago in a mtg and on the ML,
plan was to have some feedback ready by next week's mtg ( that may slip tho due to changed times and all of meeting, I will however give whatever feedback we do have by the next mktg meeting for you ( I may even have time to start a stub branch for it by then.
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 11:04 AM, Stephen Gallagher sgallagh@redhat.com wrote:
First order of business will be addressing the open seats; as of right now, neither Dan Mossor (danofsatx) nor Danishka Navin (hanthana) have replied to the "continued interest" thread, so it is likely that both of their seats will be up for consideration.
At present, we have at least one self-nomination for an open seat: Stephen Smoogen (smooge). It was unclear to me whether any of the other respondents to the WhenIsGood were self-nominating.
Once the seats are decided, we will pick our new meeting time. Right now, the optimum time would appear to be 1500 US/Eastern (1900 UTC) on either Tuesdays or Thursdays which would accommodate everyone who replied except for linuxmodder (sorry, Corey).
I'll express a slight preference to taking the Tuesday slot, as it gives us a last chance to discuss things before Go/No-Go meetings at the various Fedora milestones.
If anyone else would like to raise an agenda item for tomorrow's meeting, please speak up.
Hi Stephen, I'd like to nominate myself if there is still an open seat.
Regards,
Vinny
server@lists.fedoraproject.org
-
Corey W Sheldon -
Jon Stanley -
Justin W. Flory -
Kevin Fenzi -
Stephen Gallagher -
Stephen John Smoogen -
Vinny Valdez