2014-07-09 @ **17:00 UTC** - F21 Blocker Review #1

[Mike Ruckman]

# F21 Blocker Review meeting #1
# Date: 2014-07-09
# Time: 17:00 UTC (13:00 EST, 10:00 PST)
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net

Well folks, it's that time again. Throughout the planning process for
Fedora.next, we've been able to identify some potential blockers and we
should review them. As of today there are 13 proposed blockers and one
proposed FE for F21 Alpha. The full list can be found here:
https://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/milestone/21/alpha/buglist

With the branch today we'll be getting back into the swing of regular
blocker review meetings - so prepare to re-block off your Wednesday
mornings :) This meeting will also be a good chance to figure out ways
of handling the different products going forward. Information on the
release criteria for F21 can be found on the wiki [0]. Product specific
plans are still being solidified, but that should be sorted quickly.

For more information about the Blocker and Freeze exception process,
check out these links:
  - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_blocker_bug_process
  - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_freeze_exception_bug_process

And for those of you who are curious how a Blocker Review Meeting
works - or how it's supposed to go - check out the SOP on the wiki:
  - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting

See you tomorrow!

[0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Release_Criteria

==
// Mike
Fedora QA
irc: roshi | twitter: roshi_fedora 
blog: roshi.fedorapeople.org

[Igor Gnatenko]

Hi,
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 4:20 AM, Mike Ruckman <roshi(a)fedoraproject.org&gt; wrote:
>  # F21 Blocker Review meeting #1
>  # Date: 2014-07-09
>  # Time: 17:00 UTC (13:00 EST, 10:00 PST)
>  # Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.neteria
>  ...
>  ==
>  // Mike
>  Fedora QA
>  irc: roshi | twitter: roshi_fedora
>  blog: roshi.fedorapeople.org 
Why this msg not going to the test-announce@? :P

[Bruno Wolff III]

On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 23:07:12 +0400,
  Igor Gnatenko <ignatenkobrain(a)fedoraproject.org&gt; wrote:
> Hi,
> On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 4:20 AM, Mike Ruckman <roshi(a)fedoraproject.org&gt; wrote:
> > # F21 Blocker Review meeting #1
> > # Date: 2014-07-09
> > # Time: 17:00 UTC (13:00 EST, 10:00 PST)
> > # Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.neteria
> > ...
> > ==
> > // Mike
> > Fedora QA
> > irc: roshi | twitter: roshi_fedora
> > blog: roshi.fedorapeople.org
> Why this msg not going to the test-announce@? :P 
I don't think the meeting log needs to go to test-announce. If the complaint 
is really about the meeting notice, then that is arguably a reasonable 
suggestion.

[Igor Gnatenko]

On Wed, 2014-07-09 at 14:09 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>  On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 23:07:12 +0400,
>    Igor Gnatenko <ignatenkobrain(a)fedoraproject.org&gt; wrote:
>  >Hi,
>  >On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 4:20 AM, Mike Ruckman <roshi(a)fedoraproject.org&gt; wrote:
>  >> # F21 Blocker Review meeting #1
>  >> # Date: 2014-07-09
>  >> # Time: 17:00 UTC (13:00 EST, 10:00 PST)
>  >> # Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.neteria
>  >> ...
>  >> ==
>  >> // Mike
>  >> Fedora QA
>  >> irc: roshi | twitter: roshi_fedora
>  >> blog: roshi.fedorapeople.org
>  >Why this msg not going to the test-announce@? :P
>  
>  I don't think the meeting log needs to go to test-announce. If the complaint 
>  is really about the meeting notice, then that is arguably a reasonable 
>  suggestion. 
This isn't meeting minutes.
>  Well folks, it's that time again. Throughout the planning process
> for
>  Fedora.next, we've been able to identify some potential blockers and we
>  should review them. As of today there are 13 proposed blockers and one
>  proposed FE for F21 Alpha. The full list can be found here:
>  https://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/milestone/21/alpha/buglist 
-- 
-Igor Gnatenko