6:49 a.m.
Hi all,
as usual marketing team drafted the talking points page [1].
I'm not sure about the correct splitting up between the flavours and,
of course, I'll be glad if you do correct any mistake in that page.
[1]https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_23_talking_points
Thanks.
Gabri
7:55 a.m.
On 08/04/2015 07:49 AM, Gabriele Trombini wrote:
Hi all,
as usual marketing team drafted the talking points page [1].
I'm not sure about the correct splitting up between the flavours and,
of course, I'll be glad if you do correct any mistake in that page.
[1]https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_23_talking_points
Hey - this is fantastic, thanks so much! Only one or two
comments/observations:
- Should we have an "elevator pitch" for this release, and what would it
be? What's the overall "theme" for Fedora 23?
- Should there be something about GCC in this set of talking points?
Best,
jzb
--
Joe Brockmeier | Community Team, OSAS
jzb(a)redhat.com | http://community.redhat.com/
Twitter: @jzb | http://dissociatedpress.net/
9:11 a.m.
On Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 08:55:43AM -0400, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
- Should we have an "elevator pitch" for this release, and
what would it
be? What's the overall "theme" for Fedora 23?
The current story of "back on the six month track" seems okay, although
that's also true of F22. I think we're also on track to have Atomic
_separate_ from those releases, which is a big deal — even if you're
not an Atomic user, it represents our first deliverable like that...
something driven by the six-month engine but not tied to it.
- Should there be something about GCC in this set of talking points?
Yes. :)
--
Matthew Miller
<mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org>
Fedora Project Leader
3181
days inactive
3181
days old
server@lists.fedoraproject.org
3 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Gabriele Trombini -
Joe Brockmeier -
Matthew Miller