Call for Agenda for Server WG Meeting (2014-03-11)

[Stephen Gallagher]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Suggested items:

 * Finalize firewall decision (I think the thread on the list has
mostly come to a close)
 * Implementation discussion of Roles.


Also, the USA has its DST shift this weekend. In general, do we want
to keep the same UTC time (so US attendees shift to 10am EDT/7am PDT)
or do we want to push it back one hour UTC?

I know that 7am is hard for PDT, but 6pm may also be difficult for CET.
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAlMZ0MwACgkQeiVVYja6o6Nv9wCgqxwVcM+V5a8Who0Pwj/g3Iwy
> QGQAoKo/CyLo/qSa3S0O1iwNdGdEgyM4
> =M9/Z
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[Stephen Gallagher]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 03/07/2014 08:59 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>  Suggested items:
>  
>  * Finalize firewall decision (I think the thread on the list has 
>  mostly come to a close) * Implementation discussion of Roles.
>  
>  
>  Also, the USA has its DST shift this weekend. In general, do we
>  want to keep the same UTC time (so US attendees shift to 10am
>  EDT/7am PDT) or do we want to push it back one hour UTC?
>  
>  I know that 7am is hard for PDT, but 6pm may also be difficult for
>  CET. 
Just a reminder, I need responses on whether we should be following US
DST or UTC for this week's meeting.
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAlMdrMcACgkQeiVVYja6o6ONMQCfRrB9IkGHOq71nLjJHq/+4F9w
> imoAoJH68D13PZnixSDFvpd3EetfnRT5
> =lQ3M
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[Simo Sorce]

On Mon, 2014-03-10 at 08:15 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>  -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>  Hash: SHA1
>  
>  On 03/07/2014 08:59 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>  > Suggested items:
>  > 
>  > * Finalize firewall decision (I think the thread on the list has 
>  > mostly come to a close) * Implementation discussion of Roles.
>  > 
>  > 
>  > Also, the USA has its DST shift this weekend. In general, do we
>  > want to keep the same UTC time (so US attendees shift to 10am
>  > EDT/7am PDT) or do we want to push it back one hour UTC?
>  > 
>  > I know that 7am is hard for PDT, but 6pm may also be difficult for
>  > CET.
>  
>  Just a reminder, I need responses on whether we should be following US
>  DST or UTC for this week's meeting. 
W/o knowing which is the largest (I really don't) pick the time of the
largest group, so a minority will be impacted by the insanity of DST
time changes.

Simo.

-- 
Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York

[Stephen Gallagher]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 03/10/2014 08:55 AM, Simo Sorce wrote:
>  On Mon, 2014-03-10 at 08:15 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
> > 
> > On 03/07/2014 08:59 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> >> Suggested items:
> >> 
> >> * Finalize firewall decision (I think the thread on the list
> >> has mostly come to a close) * Implementation discussion of
> >> Roles.
> >> 
> >> 
> >> Also, the USA has its DST shift this weekend. In general, do
> >> we want to keep the same UTC time (so US attendees shift to
> >> 10am EDT/7am PDT) or do we want to push it back one hour UTC?
> >> 
> >> I know that 7am is hard for PDT, but 6pm may also be difficult
> >> for CET.
> > 
> > Just a reminder, I need responses on whether we should be
> > following US DST or UTC for this week's meeting.
>  
>  W/o knowing which is the largest (I really don't) pick the time of
>  the largest group, so a minority will be impacted by the insanity
>  of DST time changes. 

I believe we have:

USA:
* sgallagh
* simo
* nirik
* mizmo
* adamw

Non-USA:
* mitr
* tuanta

Unknown (to me):
* davidstrauss
* Evolution

With at least five in the USA meaning a majority, I suppose we should
go with 11am EDT, then.
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAlMdtxUACgkQeiVVYja6o6OIlgCggcCW8gOP4de5rpys8x3G+vNt
> y5sAoKJsd/4M+tmJYXSSdqjC7RCprMf7
> =5MXn
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[Truong Anh Tuan]

----- Original Message -----
>  From: "Stephen Gallagher" <sgallagh(a)redhat.com&gt;
>  To: server(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>  Sent: Monday, March 10, 2014 7:59:02 PM
>  Subject: Re: Call for Agenda for Server WG Meeting (2014-03-11)
>  
>  With at least five in the USA meaning a majority, I suppose we should
>  go with 11am EDT, then. 
It is 10pm here so it is even better to me. See you.

Kind regards,
Tuan