Hey folks! Please see attached. Due to some late-breaking blockers and fixes, we're now up to RC5 for F36 Final. Go/no-go is tomorrow. If folks can help with testing, that'd be great.
Here's a quick summary of the changes between the RC composes:
RC1 -> RC2 gtk4-4.6.2-3.fc36 to fix #2071228 clevis-pin-tpm2-0.5.2-1.fc36 rust-tpm2-policy-0.6.0-1.fc36 to fix FTBFS
RC2 -> RC3 wpa_supplicant-2.10-4.fc36 to fix #2072070 tracker-miners-3.3.0-2.fc36 to fix #2079308 mutter-42.0-6.fc36 to fix #2081070 openssl-3.0.2-4.fc36 to fix #2069239 gzip-1.11-3.fc36 to fix #2073312 kernel-5.17.5-300.fc36 for #2080694 snapper-0.10.1-1.fc36 for FTBFS selinux-policy-36.8-1.fc36 for #2065940 livecd-tools-30.0-1.fc36 for #2007045 xz-5.2.5-9.fc36 for #2080938 xdg-desktop-portal-1.12.4-1.fc36 for #2060990 sssd-2.7.0-1.fc36 for #2077856 gr-osmosdr-0.2.3-21.20210217gita100eb02.fc36 to fix FTBFS
RC3 -> RC4 firefox-100.0-2.fc36 for #2081488
RC4 -> RC5 sushi-41.2-1.fc36 for #2067969 gnome-photos-42.0-2.fc36 for #2079344 #2081291 aws-2020-7.fc36 matreshka-20.1-10.fc36 templates_parser-11.8.0-30.fc36 for FTBFS
So, RC3 had quite a lot of change in it. RC4 and RC5 are much more limited. So we can count most tests from RC3 or later as being valid for RC5; tests of Firefox, Nautilus and GNOME Photos should be re- confirmed.
I have transferred results from RC3 and RC4 to RC5 in the matrix where appropriate, leaving out things that are considered 'sanity tests' (basic boot and install tests) which we try to run on every compose to rule out some kind of cosmic bit-flip unexpectedly breaking an image. So any spaces left on Basic/Beta/Final tests are ones we should try to fill.
Special note on the Active Directory tests: it looks like tflink and sgallagh ran these on RC1, thanks a lot. Since we did get a new sssd between then and RC5 it would be *nice* if we could run them again, but if not we can probably run with the RC1 results in the end.
Thanks again everyone!
On Wed, May 4, 2022 at 8:38 PM Adam Williamson adamwill@fedoraproject.org wrote: ..
Special note on the Active Directory tests: it looks like tflink and sgallagh ran these on RC1, thanks a lot. Since we did get a new sssd between then and RC5 it would be *nice* if we could run them again, but if not we can probably run with the RC1 results in the end.
Gah! There was a full-on SSSD rebase in an RC?
I'll rerun a minimum set of the AD tests to be on the safe side.
On Thu, May 5, 2022 at 10:38 AM Stephen Gallagher sgallagh@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, May 4, 2022 at 8:38 PM Adam Williamson adamwill@fedoraproject.org wrote: ..
Special note on the Active Directory tests: it looks like tflink and sgallagh ran these on RC1, thanks a lot. Since we did get a new sssd between then and RC5 it would be *nice* if we could run them again, but if not we can probably run with the RC1 results in the end.
Gah! There was a full-on SSSD rebase in an RC?
I'll rerun a minimum set of the AD tests to be on the safe side.
Looking all good here.
On Thu, 2022-05-05 at 11:36 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On Thu, May 5, 2022 at 10:38 AM Stephen Gallagher sgallagh@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, May 4, 2022 at 8:38 PM Adam Williamson adamwill@fedoraproject.org wrote: ..
Special note on the Active Directory tests: it looks like tflink and sgallagh ran these on RC1, thanks a lot. Since we did get a new sssd between then and RC5 it would be *nice* if we could run them again, but if not we can probably run with the RC1 results in the end.
Gah! There was a full-on SSSD rebase in an RC?
I'll rerun a minimum set of the AD tests to be on the safe side.
Looking all good here.
Thanks. Yeah, sorry about that, it sort of snuck through without me thinking about it - it was pushed to fix an upgrade issue from F35, since the same version has already been pushed stable to F35, and there's some kind of package split or something (I forget the details), upgrades were choking unless you enabled updates-testing to get the newer version on F36 too.
server@lists.fedoraproject.org
-
Adam Williamson -
Stephen Gallagher