The meeting will take place
===========================================================
Fedora Server IRC meeting Wednesday, April 20 17:00 ==UTC==
irc.libera.chat #fedora-meeting
===========================================================
Please, check your local time using "date -d ‚2022-04-20 17:00UTC‘"
The agenda is quite extensive. I added a proposal for most topics hoping to keep the
discussion as strongly topic-centered as possible. Maybe that way we can focus the
discussion to get everything done in time without sacrificing anything.
== Agenda ==
https://pagure.io/fedora-server/report/Meeting
1. = Follow up actions =
2. = Discussion of a potential change to Fedora surrounding the default hostname =
We have currently no issue for this topic.
I welcome Dusty Mabe who asked for it.
3. = Planning for Fedora 37: Introducing a Server VM KVM virtual disk image =
#link
https://pagure.io/fedora-server/issue/79
#link
https://pagure.io/fedora-server/issue/53 (additional details)
#proposed WG decides to add a Fedora Server Edition VM image and to make a corresponding
Change proposal according #79 and #53
Please add your options as comment to the ticket #79!
4. = Followup: Supplement to our Product requirements Document (PRD) =
https://pagure.io/fedora-server/issue/83
#proposed WG decides to amend the PRD as proposed in ticket 83. pboy edits the PRD and
initializes the required processing
Please add your options as comment to ticket #83!
5. = Evaluating Fedora Server Working Group =
#link
https://pagure.io/fedora-server/issue/67
#proposed WG agrees to open a voting on the admision of cooltshirtguy, dcavalca, eseyman
and mowest.
Please add your options or additional candidates as comment to ticket #67!
6. = Current discussion about withdrawal of BIOS boot for new installations in F37 =
We have currently no ticket about this
#link
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.o...
#link
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.o...
#proposed Server WG rejects the Change proposal in its current form. This would
practically force Server users to switch to another distribution.
#proposed A constructive solution to reduce the burden on maintainers must fully and
unrestrictedly support the bios boot option for the next expected 5-8 years (release
blocker).
7. = Open floor =
For any additions or changes, please reply to this email.